71 sec in total
3.2 sec
43.3 sec
24.5 sec
Click here to check amazing Tech Radar content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about techradar.com
The latest technology news and reviews, covering computing, home entertainment systems, gadgets and more
Visit techradar.comWe analyzed Techradar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3.2 sec and then it took 67.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
techradar.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value5.2 s
23/100
25%
Value17.2 s
0/100
10%
Value8,970 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value47.5 s
0/100
10%
3235 ms
2725 ms
2524 ms
2524 ms
4043 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Techradar.com, 12% (7 requests) were made to As.casalemedia.com and 10% (6 requests) were made to . The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 2.8 MB (54%)
5.1 MB
2.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Techradar.com main page is 5.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 195.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 195.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 124.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tech Radar images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.8 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.8 MB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 590.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Techradar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 590.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (61%)
46
18
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tech Radar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.techradar.com
3235 ms
header.js
2725 ms
gpt.js
2524 ms
184056-184008355455774.js
2524 ms
BL7j9PaotYBdPHJs5nj92S-320-80.jpg
4043 ms
a4d1eeb57cbc1146d911c1bb50f95316.gif
2751 ms
gAPcfuJct6KNcBLCa6nmHR-320-80.jpg
2695 ms
o4v8fSevYUrG2698Xq2hrC-320-80.jpg
2727 ms
KQTxRCV82YLPouhebfsBKi-320-80.jpg
2726 ms
missing-image.svg
2726 ms
publishertag.js
764 ms
cygnus
492 ms
gshowad.js
383 ms
9788.js
859 ms
pubads_impl_147.js
0 ms
headerstats
603 ms
arj
0 ms
seSV5uSwl+ZlGhg4unDml6UWFSfnF6WyuJYW5YOE3ZwMDKG0EU9afmlRcWlBalFmfhFU0BhKmzClpQEAIKp4BAAAAA==
521 ms
wKKKiwIooqprgSSiqltDLKKqe8CiqqpLIqqqqmuhpqqqW2Ouqqp74GGmqksSaaaqa5FlpqpbU22mqnvQ466qSzLrrqprs9NpthprNWeWeWReZba6ctQYR5QaTplvvhp4VWm+Oyt75bZ5fffvljk71uum6fHnpaopfbervhlvfCHnngof36+Gappx57oq+PPpurv34GGGSgwTYYYpihhhthlJFGG+ODscYbZ4JJJjphoykmm2qaT7445ZkDDnrujRcOOeyY46444qirZjvnvDNBlK9BdBATxAZxQXyQoJD77rjr3r+x5JXm5LCX5mUaGDi6cOaXpRYVJ+cXpbK4lhblg4TdnAwMobQRT1p+aVFxaUFqUWZ+EVTQGEqbMKWlAQAgqngEAAAA
520 ms
fgYYZKDBNhhimKGGG2GUkUYb44OxxhtngkkmOmGjKSabappPvjjlmQMOeu6NFw457JjjrjjiqKtmO+e8M0GUr0F0EBPEBnFBfJCgkPvuuOvev7HklebksJfmZRoYOLpw5pelFhUn5xelsriWFuWDhN2cDAyhtBFPWn5pUXFpQWpRZn4RVNAYSpswpaUBACCqeAQAAAA=
376 ms
fgYYZKDBNhhimKGGG2GUkUYb44OxxhtngkkmOmGjKSabappPvjjlmQMOeu6NFw457JjjrjjiqKtmO+e8M0GUr0F0EBPEBnFBfJCgkPvuuOvev7HklebksJfmZRoYOLpw5pelFhUn5xelsriWFuWDhN2cDAyhtBFPWn5pUXFpQWpRZn4RVNAYSpswpaUBACCqeAQAAAA=
376 ms
seSV5uSwl+ZlGhg4unDml6UWFSfnF6WyuJYW5YOE3ZwMDKG0EU9afmlRcWlBalFmfhFU0BhKmzClpQEAIKp4BAAAAA==
418 ms
nsAU4Y69vhdzTf5sx0lT8KK42vuMhoRt59wkxLqyXN0k1ZE2q+mW3KQ12rLaxMFDGVwdUrUizYZSx1plyZZO6LdpQ1KlyClZCElz5uVsobSmLN1OxbnIcvJunDPnmlKja9cruKRYs8hCBEmQi2tV0SQEUrufUlmpaWhU5cmS8+NW8bc6cMGPLPquEJYmzodVcO11EPda0m8fbthuJ3WGZM8ruYx9o3x4VdzQvP17hk0hfFivMfE6iOs5RdEfysT6XAA=
253 ms
pd
836 ms
headerstats
833 ms
openx
539 ms
pixel
536 ms
jpt
420 ms
openx
462 ms
sync
295 ms
pixel
330 ms
sd
312 ms
jpt
220 ms
jpt
2042 ms
sd
2019 ms
sd
1982 ms
sd
1952 ms
sd
1952 ms
jpt
1706 ms
jpt
1697 ms
jpt
1750 ms
sync
1343 ms
fastlane.json
1204 ms
fastlane.json
1269 ms
fastlane.json
1250 ms
fastlane.json
1450 ms
fastlane.json
1235 ms
fastlane.json
1345 ms
AdCallAggregator
1305 ms
container.html
1128 ms
headerstats
1116 ms
headerstats
774 ms
headerstats
300 ms
headerstats
605 ms
analytics.js
3092 ms
2505110097.js
3032 ms
beacon.js
2532 ms
require.min.js
2519 ms
techradar.min.css
297 ms
techradar.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
techradar.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
techradar.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Techradar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Techradar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
techradar.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tech Radar. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: