4.4 sec in total
214 ms
3.9 sec
266 ms
Click here to check amazing Tempack content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tempack.com
Tempack thermal packaging and cold chain shipping solutions including temperature-controlled containers, boxes, cold packs.
Visit tempack.comWe analyzed Tempack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 214 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
tempack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.5 s
6/100
10%
Value15.6 s
0/100
25%
Value17.4 s
0/100
10%
Value3,360 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.241
52/100
15%
Value19.4 s
2/100
10%
214 ms
423 ms
166 ms
45 ms
246 ms
Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (86 requests) were addressed to the original Tempack.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Tempack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 172.5 kB (30%)
581.9 kB
409.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Tempack.com main page is 581.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 271.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 171.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 171.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tempack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (79%)
84
18
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tempack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tempack.com
214 ms
tempack.com
423 ms
style.min.css
166 ms
css
45 ms
styles.css
246 ms
settings.css
249 ms
fontello.css
251 ms
font-awesome.css
259 ms
spam-protect-for-contact-form7.css
258 ms
style.min.css
256 ms
style.crush.css
2194 ms
style.css
410 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
26 ms
style.css
430 ms
magnific-popup.css
267 ms
style.css
268 ms
style.min.css
271 ms
themes.min.css
374 ms
js_composer.min.css
539 ms
style.css
374 ms
ubermenu.min.css
416 ms
minimal.css
436 ms
all.min.css
444 ms
gdpr-main-nf.css
447 ms
jquery.min.js
582 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
519 ms
bt_elements.js
532 ms
snazzymaps.js
534 ms
jq-sticky-anything.min.js
602 ms
spam-protect-for-contact-form7.js
618 ms
script.min.js
621 ms
html5shiv.min.js
623 ms
respond.min.js
664 ms
header.misc.js
684 ms
09655cd0.js
886 ms
comment-reply.min.js
708 ms
index.js
712 ms
index.js
746 ms
cf7-google-analytics.min.js
765 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
23 ms
api.js
45 ms
js
49 ms
150000698.js
22 ms
v4-shims.min.css
796 ms
all.min.css
715 ms
rs6.css
667 ms
rbtools.min.js
772 ms
rs6.min.js
909 ms
stickThis.js
717 ms
utmtracker.min.js
741 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
798 ms
main.js
716 ms
slick.min.js
738 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
758 ms
iscroll.js
732 ms
fancySelect.js
697 ms
misc.js
715 ms
dir.hover.js
737 ms
sliders.js
740 ms
bt_parallax.js
721 ms
scripts.js
725 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
725 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
675 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
718 ms
index.js
711 ms
ubermenu.min.js
708 ms
main.js
680 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
676 ms
esg.min.js
720 ms
ga-audiences
246 ms
tempack-logo-white-csafe@2x-1.png-.png
234 ms
softbox-systems-single-use-shipper-icon.svg
230 ms
softbox-systems-reusable-shipper-icon.svg
231 ms
tempack-containers-for-vehicles-mega-menu-1.svg
231 ms
tempack-life-sciences-packaging-blue-1.svg
228 ms
tempack-cold-packs.svg
231 ms
dummy.png
631 ms
tempack-new-office-news-image-en.jpg
633 ms
softbox-systems-csafe-acquisition.jpg
632 ms
tempack-redefined@2x.jpg
631 ms
tempack-containers-for-vehicles-blue.svg
630 ms
softbox-systems-customised-systems.svg
631 ms
tempack-sustainability-reduce-ecological-footprint-2@2x.jpg
778 ms
tempack-map-white.svg
788 ms
tempack-logo-2@2x-640x151.png
747 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-B4iFV0Uw.ttf
264 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-NYiFV0Uw.ttf
574 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-WYiFV0Uw.ttf
576 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-2Y-FV0Uw.ttf
577 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-4I-FV0Uw.ttf
578 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-h4-FV0Uw.ttf
578 ms
iJWZBXyIfDnIV5PNhY1KTN7Z-Yh-ro-FV0Uw.ttf
578 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
793 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
824 ms
recaptcha__en.js
523 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
691 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
741 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
695 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
650 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
696 ms
print.css
83 ms
tempack.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
tempack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
tempack.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tempack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tempack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tempack.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tempack. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: