Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

template-run.jp

 無料ダウンロード!テンプレルン

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

533 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

461 ms

template-run.jp screenshot

About Website

Welcome to template-run.jp homepage info - get ready to check Template Run best content for Japan right away, or after learning these important things about template-run.jp

無料で使えるテンプレートやイラストがダウンロード出来る雛形サイトです。年賀状素材や領収書や請求書などから駐車許可証、結婚証明書などのテンプレが無料ダウンロードが出来ますのでお気軽にご利用くださいませ。

Visit template-run.jp

Key Findings

We analyzed Template-run.jp page load time and found that the first response time was 533 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

template-run.jp performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

25/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

37/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.6 s

7/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,030 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.0 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

template-run.jp

533 ms

template-run.jp

1035 ms

js

61 ms

style.css

197 ms

common.css

352 ms

Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 40% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Template-run.jp, 12% (8 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 12% (8 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Template-run.jp.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 562.8 kB (18%)

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Template-run.jp main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 52.1 kB

  • Original 64.7 kB
  • After minification 61.4 kB
  • After compression 12.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 163.7 kB

  • Original 2.1 MB
  • After minification 2.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Template Run images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 341.6 kB

  • Original 883.5 kB
  • After minification 882.5 kB
  • After compression 541.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 341.6 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

  • Original 20.7 kB
  • After minification 20.4 kB
  • After compression 15.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Template-run.jp needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.3 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (51%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

29

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Template Run. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

template-run.jp accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

template-run.jp best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

template-run.jp SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Template-run.jp can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Template-run.jp main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Template Run. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: