9.9 sec in total
257 ms
9.3 sec
354 ms
Welcome to test.ie homepage info - get ready to check Test best content right away, or after learning these important things about test.ie
Visit test.ieWe analyzed Test.ie page load time and found that the first response time was 257 ms and then it took 9.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
test.ie performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value12.0 s
0/100
10%
Value20.9 s
0/100
25%
Value14.2 s
1/100
10%
Value1,000 ms
27/100
30%
Value0.102
89/100
15%
Value20.7 s
2/100
10%
257 ms
1795 ms
276 ms
24 ms
219 ms
Our browser made a total of 88 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Test.ie, 84% (74 requests) were made to Packagingmachinery.ie and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) relates to the external source Packagingmachinery.ie.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (53%)
2.8 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Test.ie main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 145.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 145.8 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 59.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Test images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 769.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 769.0 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 514.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Test.ie needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 514.7 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (52%)
81
39
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Test. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
test.ie
257 ms
packagingmachinery.ie
1795 ms
layerslider.css
276 ms
css
24 ms
style.css
219 ms
SC_style.css
218 ms
css
35 ms
font-awesome.min.css
3 ms
styles.css
219 ms
style.css
219 ms
settings.css
690 ms
chosen.css
374 ms
style.css
1899 ms
animations.css
582 ms
media.css
614 ms
jquery.js
1377 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
758 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
1593 ms
greensock.js
1676 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
1358 ms
js
46 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
2071 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
2319 ms
bf_java.js
1721 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1845 ms
scripts.js
1812 ms
bf_script.js
1845 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
1929 ms
chosen.jquery.min.js
2081 ms
chosen-frontend.min.js
1970 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
2079 ms
woocommerce.min.js
2079 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
2131 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
2153 ms
comment-reply.min.js
2217 ms
modernizr-min.js
2213 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-min.js
2444 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto-min.js
2342 ms
add-to-cart-variation.min.js
2301 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
2462 ms
jquery.fitvids-min.js
2381 ms
main.js
3930 ms
webfont.js
33 ms
logo2.png
496 ms
background1.jpg
1129 ms
transparent.png
511 ms
slider_bg-horizon_03.png
834 ms
ertal_detector_03.png
1496 ms
fortress3.png
781 ms
checkWeighers_03.png
1916 ms
sparc_03.png
1412 ms
weight.png
2128 ms
customers1.jpg
1782 ms
customers2.jpg
2016 ms
customers3.jpg
2017 ms
customers4.jpg
2126 ms
customers5.jpg
2104 ms
customers6.jpg
2126 ms
customers7.jpg
2186 ms
customers8.jpg
2183 ms
customers9.jpg
2271 ms
customers10.jpg
2293 ms
customers11.jpg
2293 ms
customers12.jpg
2293 ms
customers13.jpg
2350 ms
customers14.jpg
2331 ms
customers15.jpg
2413 ms
customers16.jpg
2435 ms
Twin-head-500x416.jpg
2951 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
25 ms
analytics.js
12 ms
css
26 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
20 ms
collect
25 ms
font-awesome.css
2490 ms
icomoon.woff
2424 ms
3-Fortress-conveyor-metal-detector-with-auto-reject1-500x416.jpg
3007 ms
Dimaco-label-verifier-off-line-conveyor-type-500x416.jpg
3024 ms
Sarc-Systems-Combined-metal-detector-+-checkweigher-+-optional-label-verification-500x416.jpg
2996 ms
cert_03.png
2525 ms
pdf_small.png
2667 ms
IgZJs4-7SA1XX_edsoXWog.ttf
117 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
118 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
807 ms
bullet.png
477 ms
FUDHvzEKSJww3kCxuiAo2A.ttf
7 ms
shadow-top.png
169 ms
shadow-bottom.png
169 ms
test.ie accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
test.ie best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
test.ie SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Test.ie can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Test.ie main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
test.ie
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Test. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: