5.5 sec in total
88 ms
1.1 sec
4.3 sec
Welcome to texasstrongrw.org homepage info - get ready to check Texas Strong Rw best content right away, or after learning these important things about texasstrongrw.org
Visit texasstrongrw.orgWe analyzed Texasstrongrw.org page load time and found that the first response time was 88 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
texasstrongrw.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value7.8 s
3/100
25%
Value11.5 s
5/100
10%
Value200 ms
90/100
30%
Value0.33
34/100
15%
Value54.2 s
0/100
10%
88 ms
77 ms
69 ms
21 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 87 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Texasstrongrw.org, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (439 ms) belongs to the original domain Texasstrongrw.org.
Page size can be reduced by 333.9 kB (2%)
18.2 MB
17.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Texasstrongrw.org main page is 18.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 17.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 264.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Texas Strong Rw images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 3.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 5.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Texasstrongrw.org has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 43 (54%)
80
37
The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Texas Strong Rw. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
texasstrongrw.org
88 ms
texasstrongrw.org
77 ms
style.css
69 ms
fancybox.css
21 ms
css
27 ms
awesome.css
64 ms
jquery-ui.css
63 ms
vc-customize.css
70 ms
shortcodes.css
62 ms
resize.css
34 ms
style.min.css
49 ms
subscribe-forms.min.css
74 ms
click-to-tweet.min.css
115 ms
easy-social-share-buttons.min.css
111 ms
js_composer.min.css
135 ms
jquery.min.js
126 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
128 ms
flexslider.css
81 ms
public.css
94 ms
email-decode.min.js
98 ms
fancybox.js
117 ms
fancybox-media.js
168 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
168 ms
masonry.min.js
131 ms
actual.js
165 ms
circles.js
171 ms
scroll.js
166 ms
custom.js
178 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
165 ms
jQuery.easing.min.js
166 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
167 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
168 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
201 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
223 ms
dom-ready.min.js
175 ms
hooks.min.js
176 ms
i18n.min.js
216 ms
a11y.min.js
187 ms
jquery.json.min.js
217 ms
gravityforms.min.js
174 ms
placeholders.jquery.min.js
170 ms
utils.min.js
155 ms
vendor-theme.min.js
175 ms
scripts-theme.min.js
155 ms
Long-Logo-2-e1702954971650.png
139 ms
TSRW-WEBSITE-SLIDERS-1.gif
44 ms
TSRW-WEBSITE-SLIDERS-2.gif
436 ms
TSRW-WEBSITE-SLIDERS.gif
198 ms
Web-Newsletter-Images-1-1024x536.png
44 ms
Web-Newsletter-Images-1024x536.png
46 ms
Yellow-Modern-Video-Game-Awards-Voting-Announcement-Facebook-Ad-1024x536.png
49 ms
To-Our-Members-3-300x300.png
47 ms
To-Our-Members-1.png
47 ms
To-Our-Members.png
68 ms
0E1A0402-scaled.jpg
205 ms
0E1A0404-scaled.jpg
70 ms
0E1A0387-Recovered-scaled.jpg
72 ms
0E1A0395-scaled.jpg
93 ms
0E1A0393-scaled.jpg
207 ms
0E1A0408-scaled.jpg
136 ms
0E1A0467-scaled.jpg
213 ms
0E1A0464-scaled.jpg
205 ms
0E1A0439-scaled.jpg
212 ms
0E1A0414-scaled.jpg
330 ms
0E1A0422-scaled.jpg
216 ms
0E1A0460-scaled.jpg
214 ms
0E1A0411-scaled.jpg
334 ms
0E1A0438-scaled.jpg
319 ms
0E1A0433-scaled.jpg
329 ms
0E1A0435-scaled.jpg
231 ms
0E1A0430-scaled.jpg
243 ms
0E1A0515-scaled.jpg
257 ms
0E1A0513-scaled.jpg
274 ms
0E1A0508-scaled.jpg
287 ms
0E1A0485-scaled.jpg
299 ms
0E1A0457-scaled.jpg
317 ms
0E1A0451-scaled.jpg
334 ms
0E1A0455-scaled.jpg
439 ms
ijwTs5juQtsyLLR5jN4cxBEoTJzawg.ttf
89 ms
ijwOs5juQtsyLLR5jN4cxBEoRG_50uYVLg.ttf
148 ms
ijwOs5juQtsyLLR5jN4cxBEoREP-0uYVLg.ttf
149 ms
ijwOs5juQtsyLLR5jN4cxBEoRCf_0uYVLg.ttf
174 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
309 ms
pinterest-pro.min.js
255 ms
subscribe-forms.min.js
263 ms
essb-core.min.js
235 ms
bg_direction_nav.png
173 ms
texasstrongrw.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
texasstrongrw.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
texasstrongrw.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Texasstrongrw.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Texasstrongrw.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
texasstrongrw.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Texas Strong Rw. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: