1.5 sec in total
183 ms
973 ms
364 ms
Welcome to texteditors.org homepage info - get ready to check Text Editors best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about texteditors.org
A website about selecting and classifying text editors used in programming systems. These are the programming text editors such as Emacs, VI, Multiedit, slick, Slickedit, ISPF, Notepad, VI and VIM tha...
Visit texteditors.orgWe analyzed Texteditors.org page load time and found that the first response time was 183 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
texteditors.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
68/100
10%
Value2.7 s
85/100
25%
Value3.9 s
83/100
10%
Value790 ms
37/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.4 s
60/100
10%
183 ms
65 ms
6 ms
52 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 12% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Texteditors.org, 24% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 24% (4 requests) were made to Tpc.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (239 ms) relates to the external source Googleads.g.doubleclick.net.
Page size can be reduced by 13.4 kB (28%)
47.6 kB
34.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Texteditors.org main page is 47.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 18.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 12.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.6 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 624 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Text Editors images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 66 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 88 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Texteditors.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 88 B or 39% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 5 (33%)
15
10
The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Text Editors. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
wiki.pl
183 ms
wiki.css
65 ms
show_ads.js
6 ms
ca-pub-9288685682436364.js
52 ms
zrt_lookup.html
37 ms
show_ads_impl.js
52 ms
TextEditors.org_Logo.png
124 ms
ads
239 ms
osd.js
9 ms
TextEditors.org_Logo.png
129 ms
m_js_controller.js
21 ms
abg.js
40 ms
favicon
47 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
44 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
39 ms
s
21 ms
x_button_blue2.png
5 ms
texteditors.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
texteditors.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
texteditors.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Texteditors.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Texteditors.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
texteditors.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Text Editors. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: