6 sec in total
872 ms
4.9 sec
282 ms
Visit thadagam.com now to see the best up-to-date Thadagam content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about thadagam.com
Visit thadagam.comWe analyzed Thadagam.com page load time and found that the first response time was 872 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
thadagam.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value14.1 s
0/100
25%
Value12.7 s
3/100
10%
Value880 ms
32/100
30%
Value0.204
61/100
15%
Value22.1 s
1/100
10%
872 ms
74 ms
77 ms
411 ms
27 ms
Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Thadagam.com, 31% (17 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 11% (6 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Thadagam.com.
Page size can be reduced by 861.8 kB (60%)
1.4 MB
567.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Thadagam.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 610.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 50.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 50.7 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thadagam images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 453.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 453.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 346.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thadagam.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 346.9 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (50%)
36
18
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thadagam. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
thadagam.com
872 ms
styles.css
74 ms
settings.css
77 ms
captions.php
411 ms
css
27 ms
css
40 ms
css
46 ms
css
49 ms
css
47 ms
css
48 ms
td-bootstrap.css
109 ms
style.css
154 ms
jquery.js
117 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
139 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
182 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
225 ms
jquery.form.min.js
188 ms
scripts.js
179 ms
td_external.js
255 ms
site.js
247 ms
js_composer_front.js
860 ms
elements.png
1410 ms
ArpitGIB-4-745x483.jpg
2704 ms
arun11-edit-326x159.jpg
60 ms
Jaws-Unleashed-Xbox-_-326x159.jpg
2422 ms
bagath-01-edit1-299x159.jpg
1442 ms
nathi-engae-ponathu-745x483.jpg
220 ms
DSC08482-001-1-326x159.jpg
2460 ms
ArpitGIB-4-326x159.jpg
2457 ms
ArpitGIB-4-150x150.jpg
3431 ms
arun11-edit-150x150.jpg
3433 ms
Jaws-Unleashed-Xbox-_-150x150.jpg
3439 ms
bagath-01-edit1-150x150.jpg
2499 ms
nathi-engae-ponathu-150x150.jpg
3439 ms
DSC08482-001-1-150x150.jpg
3443 ms
3-150x150.jpg
3449 ms
jduSEW07_j4sIG_ERxiq4Q.woff
99 ms
HXiERDIZdwFzjXlbcMq7XPesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
192 ms
mZSs29ggGoaqrCNB3kDfZQ.woff
191 ms
I5PmmDkYShUQg-ah7wh25w.woff
100 ms
e7URzK__gdJcp1hLJYAEag.woff
190 ms
trnbTfqisuuhRVI3i45C5w.woff
100 ms
top-shadow.png
3443 ms
PyqsDANUgLi2UsdO-d4iZQ.woff
66 ms
l1cOQ90roY9yC7voEhngDD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
66 ms
dI-qzxlKVQA6TUC5RKSb3z8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
158 ms
newspaper.woff
3441 ms
Pq7I38KtY37kAe5aYFKrSA.woff
158 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsO3ikv6SQm_yYbVf3nddkGw.woff
21 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nDe1_JO-tKU0DX-oOxNOeLI.woff
16 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nBKwp2topvuiF0zixBsDXDo.woff
58 ms
GZMdC02DTXXx8AdUvU2etw.woff
59 ms
NWdMogIO7U6AtEM4dDdf_T8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
57 ms
j-TYDdXcC_eQzhhp386SjT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
58 ms
pqisLQoeO9YTDCNnlQ9bfz8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
58 ms
thadagam.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
thadagam.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
thadagam.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thadagam.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thadagam.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
thadagam.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thadagam. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: