3.3 sec in total
116 ms
2.1 sec
1.1 sec
Visit theapplicantmanager.com now to see the best up-to-date The Applicant Manager content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about theapplicantmanager.com
TAM is Applicant Tracking System Software designed for SMBs. Learn about our recruitment management system and talent management software.
Visit theapplicantmanager.comWe analyzed Theapplicantmanager.com page load time and found that the first response time was 116 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
theapplicantmanager.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
64/100
10%
Value2.6 s
87/100
25%
Value2.6 s
97/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.034
100/100
15%
Value2.7 s
97/100
10%
116 ms
256 ms
159 ms
223 ms
134 ms
Our browser made a total of 102 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Theapplicantmanager.com, 14% (14 requests) were made to Os212.infusionsoft.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Theapplicantmanager.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (18%)
5.6 MB
4.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Theapplicantmanager.com main page is 5.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 33.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.7 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 517.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, The Applicant Manager needs image optimization as it can save up to 517.0 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 229.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 229.6 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 243.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Theapplicantmanager.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 243.7 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (34%)
93
61
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The Applicant Manager. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
theapplicantmanager.com
116 ms
theapplicantmanager.com
256 ms
animate.min.css
159 ms
tam-bs.css
223 ms
tam-bs-responsive.css
134 ms
tam-style.css
168 ms
font-awesome.min.css
136 ms
magnific-popup.css
166 ms
is-contact.css
231 ms
css
61 ms
getTrackingCode
281 ms
cf16da5159865d01864107bb692e9b68
314 ms
jquery.js
331 ms
bootstrap.min.js
281 ms
jquery.easing.js
242 ms
jquery.waitforimages.js
242 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
366 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto-3.1.4-W3C.js
364 ms
jquery.ui.totop.js
365 ms
jquery.inview.js
409 ms
jquery.parallax-1.1.3.js
410 ms
jquery.localscroll-1.2.7-min.js
473 ms
jquery.scrollTo-1.4.2-min.js
506 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
563 ms
custom.js
510 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
538 ms
ga.js
23 ms
538281.js
249 ms
__utm.gif
57 ms
bg.gif
311 ms
topbottomlinks.png
354 ms
ggbridge-color-x.png
838 ms
logo.png
402 ms
we-call-it-tam.png
434 ms
tam_responsive.png
618 ms
ggbridge-bg.png
1125 ms
EdnaN.jpg
445 ms
JimG.jpg
532 ms
Bailey.jpg
652 ms
h3.png
563 ms
jr.png
651 ms
at.png
654 ms
ag.png
715 ms
as.png
754 ms
bu.png
759 ms
bw.png
758 ms
cn.png
827 ms
cp.png
858 ms
ce.png
859 ms
co.png
856 ms
db.png
927 ms
el.png
935 ms
fp.png
918 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
37 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
79 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
132 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
151 ms
mnpfi9pxYH-Go5UiibESIqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
152 ms
GoodDog.otf
957 ms
cf16da5159865d01864107bb692e9b68
191 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
950 ms
fs.png
897 ms
gw.png
896 ms
spacer.gif
87 ms
gf.png
897 ms
gp.png
923 ms
gu.png
939 ms
lightbox_js.jsp
300 ms
lightbox_css.jsp
172 ms
anti_spam.jsp
190 ms
iFrameMagicServer.js
205 ms
getTrackingCode
188 ms
je.png
909 ms
nm.png
897 ms
of.png
896 ms
og.png
891 ms
oa.png
915 ms
r.js
117 ms
2598.js
76 ms
pg.png
880 ms
pc.png
888 ms
pr.png
872 ms
jl.png
843 ms
sf.png
850 ms
sw.png
790 ms
content.js
62 ms
yahoo-dom-event.js
51 ms
lightbox.css
59 ms
su.png
763 ms
se.png
715 ms
os212-39edfa15-0259-421b-ab4e-afeadf637269-v2
35 ms
container-min.js
111 ms
tm.png
728 ms
ty.png
729 ms
uw.png
765 ms
spacer.gif
56 ms
wc.png
703 ms
WBE.png
669 ms
2016MBE_logo.png
667 ms
TRUSTe-Privacy-Policy-Logo.png
714 ms
SafeHarbor.png
652 ms
__ptq.gif
18 ms
theapplicantmanager.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
theapplicantmanager.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
theapplicantmanager.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Theapplicantmanager.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Theapplicantmanager.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
theapplicantmanager.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of The Applicant Manager. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: