4.9 sec in total
609 ms
4 sec
332 ms
Visit theemailfinder.co now to see the best up-to-date The Email Finder content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about theemailfinder.co
Theemailfinder.co makes it simple way to find b2b email address. Enter a doamin name and we will present a list of email address related to that domain found around the internet.
Visit theemailfinder.coWe analyzed Theemailfinder.co page load time and found that the first response time was 609 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
theemailfinder.co performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value4.9 s
28/100
25%
Value8.1 s
21/100
10%
Value930 ms
30/100
30%
Value0.021
100/100
15%
Value15.2 s
7/100
10%
609 ms
81 ms
163 ms
230 ms
231 ms
Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 92% of them (101 requests) were addressed to the original Theemailfinder.co, 2% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (796 ms) belongs to the original domain Theemailfinder.co.
Page size can be reduced by 167.4 kB (21%)
779.2 kB
611.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Theemailfinder.co main page is 779.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 454.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 52.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 83.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, The Email Finder needs image optimization as it can save up to 83.1 kB or 71% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 20.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 11.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Theemailfinder.co has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 88 (85%)
104
16
The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The Email Finder. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 53 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 37 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
theemailfinder.co
609 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
81 ms
style.min.css
163 ms
classic-themes.min.css
230 ms
styles.css
231 ms
style.css
232 ms
style.css
233 ms
mm-payment.css
235 ms
mmea.css
240 ms
tt_vc_front.css
305 ms
font-awesome.min.css
307 ms
public.css
309 ms
bootstrap.min.css
391 ms
style.css
315 ms
dynamic-keysoft.css
319 ms
font-awesome.min.css
381 ms
colors-keysoft.css.php
489 ms
um-fonticons-ii.css
386 ms
um-fonticons-fa.css
398 ms
select2.min.css
400 ms
um-crop.css
457 ms
um-modal.css
463 ms
um-styles.css
465 ms
um-profile.css
471 ms
um-account.css
472 ms
um-misc.css
533 ms
um-fileupload.css
540 ms
default.css
542 ms
default.date.css
549 ms
default.time.css
549 ms
um-raty.css
563 ms
simplebar.css
609 ms
um-tipsy.css
617 ms
um-responsive.css
617 ms
um-old-default.css
625 ms
um_old_settings.css
626 ms
css
45 ms
js
66 ms
adsbygoogle.js
81 ms
css
63 ms
js_composer_front_custom.css
796 ms
jquery.min.js
689 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
535 ms
mm-payment.js
471 ms
mmea.js
480 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
478 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
551 ms
jquery.easytabs.min.js
550 ms
map.js
549 ms
tt_vc_script.js
484 ms
um-gdpr.min.js
537 ms
index.js
599 ms
index.js
592 ms
core.min.js
592 ms
effect.min.js
528 ms
mm-moreless.js
523 ms
public.js
531 ms
bootstrap.min.js
543 ms
particles.js
543 ms
scripts.js
576 ms
select2.full.min.js
571 ms
underscore.min.js
568 ms
wp-util.min.js
648 ms
um-crop.min.js
647 ms
um-modal.min.js
632 ms
um-jquery-form.min.js
587 ms
um-fileupload.min.js
580 ms
picker.js
576 ms
picker.date.js
615 ms
picker.time.js
615 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
604 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
555 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
552 ms
hooks.min.js
501 ms
i18n.min.js
574 ms
um-raty.min.js
574 ms
um-tipsy.min.js
513 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
512 ms
masonry.min.js
503 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
502 ms
simplebar.min.js
526 ms
um-functions.min.js
530 ms
um-responsive.min.js
531 ms
um-conditional.min.js
528 ms
um-scripts.min.js
527 ms
um-profile.min.js
513 ms
um-account.min.js
443 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
468 ms
logo.png
492 ms
ajax-loader.gif
268 ms
logo1-1-1.png
491 ms
logo2-1-1.png
477 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
642 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
626 ms
embed
336 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
537 ms
Montserrat-Light.otf
621 ms
logo3-1-1.png
494 ms
logo4-1-1.png
493 ms
logo5-1-1.png
451 ms
tab1-1-1.png
540 ms
testimonial1-1-1.png
536 ms
testimonial2-1-1.png
536 ms
testimonial3-1-1.png
539 ms
checked.png
536 ms
js
44 ms
analytics.js
142 ms
arrow.png
203 ms
collect
84 ms
js
122 ms
theemailfinder.co accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
theemailfinder.co best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
theemailfinder.co SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Theemailfinder.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Theemailfinder.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
theemailfinder.co
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of The Email Finder. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: