Tools & Wizards About Us
thefork.it screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 69

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

thefork.it

TheFork - Prenota nei migliori ristoranti d'Italia

Page Load Speed

3.1 sec in total

First Response

298 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

813 ms

thefork.it screenshot

About Website

Welcome to thefork.it homepage info - get ready to check The Fork best content for Italy right away, or after learning these important things about thefork.it

Con TheFork: scegli e prenota gratuitamente nei migliori ristoranti della città. Approfitta delle promozioni offerte da alcuni ristoranti.

Visit thefork.it

Key Findings

We analyzed Thefork.it page load time and found that the first response time was 298 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thefork.it performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

41/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

52/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,360 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.142

79/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.7 s

11/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

thefork.it

298 ms

www.thefork.it

354 ms

main.css

99 ms

homepage.css

73 ms

head.js

111 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Thefork.it, 33% (13 requests) were made to A.tfstatic.com and 25% (10 requests) were made to U.tfstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (590 ms) relates to the external source U.tfstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (57%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Thefork.it main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 982.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 420.5 kB

  • Original 504.6 kB
  • After minification 502.4 kB
  • After compression 84.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 420.5 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.6 kB

  • Original 780.5 kB
  • After minification 772.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. The Fork images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 682.2 kB

  • Original 982.8 kB
  • After minification 972.3 kB
  • After compression 300.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 682.2 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 504.6 kB

  • Original 586.0 kB
  • After minification 585.0 kB
  • After compression 81.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thefork.it needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 504.6 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (50%)

Requests Now

32

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 32 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of The Fork. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

thefork.it

thefork.it

298 ms

www.thefork.it

www.thefork.it

354 ms

main.css

main.css

99 ms

homepage.css

homepage.css

73 ms

head.js

head.js

111 ms

2092620231.js

2092620231.js

138 ms

satelliteLib-3a537865a7a1019077c112febd0050243be74e27.js

satelliteLib-3a537865a7a1019077c112febd0050243be74e27.js

18 ms

bundle.js

bundle.js

294 ms

national_homepage.js

national_homepage.js

54 ms

css

css

78 ms

geo2.js

geo2.js

68 ms

event

event

25 ms

mbox-contents-270fc62b6c29acb02bbaf8ef5be772b78ee24b4f.js

mbox-contents-270fc62b6c29acb02bbaf8ef5be772b78ee24b4f.js

19 ms

event

event

60 ms

icons_data_svg.css

icons_data_svg.css

95 ms

348156.jpg

348156.jpg

254 ms

461789.jpg

461789.jpg

249 ms

554404.jpg

554404.jpg

265 ms

170853.jpg

170853.jpg

266 ms

59598.jpg

59598.jpg

265 ms

376073.jpg

376073.jpg

590 ms

186790.jpg

186790.jpg

266 ms

577979.jpg

577979.jpg

267 ms

363283.jpg

363283.jpg

266 ms

subheader_national.jpg

subheader_national.jpg

263 ms

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

319 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf

446 ms

omnessemibold-roman-webfont.woff

omnessemibold-roman-webfont.woff

241 ms

omnesmedium-roman-webfont.woff

omnesmedium-roman-webfont.woff

234 ms

omnesregular-roman-webfont.woff

omnesregular-roman-webfont.woff

235 ms

cheddarjack-webfont.woff

cheddarjack-webfont.woff

310 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

289 ms

gtm.js

gtm.js

295 ms

s-code-contents-63bc7c184d56d897ea3ca55bd6c2fc2710da1142.js

s-code-contents-63bc7c184d56d897ea3ca55bd6c2fc2710da1142.js

213 ms

icons_data_svg.css

icons_data_svg.css

396 ms

newsletter-blocker-bg.jpg

newsletter-blocker-bg.jpg

85 ms

standard

standard

219 ms

55.js

55.js

149 ms

s67228140123188

s67228140123188

55 ms

ga.js

ga.js

40 ms

Accessibility Review

thefork.it accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

High

[aria-*] attributes are not valid or misspelled

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

Low

No form fields have multiple labels

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

thefork.it best practices score

69

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Registers an unload listener

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Uses deprecated APIs

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

thefork.it SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    IT

  • Language Claimed

    IT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thefork.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thefork.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

thefork.it

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of The Fork. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: