Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 45

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

1.4 sec

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

372 ms

thesharkshocker.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Thesharkshocker content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thesharkshocker.com

Visit thesharkshocker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thesharkshocker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.4 sec and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thesharkshocker.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.842

4/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

thesharkshocker.com

1380 ms

ga.js

9 ms

addthis_widget.js

40 ms

website-layout-BG.jpg

720 ms

home.png

151 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 48% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Thesharkshocker.com, 10% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 10% (3 requests) were made to S.ytimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Thesharkshocker.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 666.5 kB (39%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Thesharkshocker.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 744.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 43.9 kB

  • Original 64.5 kB
  • After minification 63.6 kB
  • After compression 20.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 43.9 kB or 68% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 13.3 kB

  • Original 744.6 kB
  • After minification 731.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thesharkshocker images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 406.7 kB

  • Original 646.6 kB
  • After minification 646.5 kB
  • After compression 239.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 406.7 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 202.6 kB

  • Original 244.2 kB
  • After minification 244.1 kB
  • After compression 41.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thesharkshocker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 202.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (25%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thesharkshocker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

thesharkshocker.com accessibility score

45

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

thesharkshocker.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

thesharkshocker.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thesharkshocker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Thesharkshocker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thesharkshocker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: