Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

thomascrampton.com

Welcome thomascrampton.com - BlueHost.com

Page Load Speed

3.5 sec in total

First Response

816 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.3 sec

thomascrampton.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Thomascrampton content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about thomascrampton.com

Bluehost - Top rated web hosting provider - Free 1 click installs For blogs, shopping carts, and more. Get a free domain name, real NON-outsourced 24/7 support, and superior speed. web hosting provide...

Visit thomascrampton.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thomascrampton.com page load time and found that the first response time was 816 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thomascrampton.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.7 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value25,410 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.026

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value38.0 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

thomascrampton.com

816 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

122 ms

style.css

119 ms

slick.min.css

26 ms

slick-theme.min.css

11 ms

Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Thomascrampton.com, 11% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 9% (4 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (816 ms) belongs to the original domain Thomascrampton.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 955.7 kB (37%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Thomascrampton.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 55.6 kB

  • Original 67.2 kB
  • After minification 64.4 kB
  • After compression 11.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 39.3 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thomascrampton images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 464.8 kB

  • Original 604.5 kB
  • After minification 491.8 kB
  • After compression 139.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 464.8 kB or 77% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 396.0 kB

  • Original 465.4 kB
  • After minification 414.2 kB
  • After compression 69.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thomascrampton.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 396.0 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (45%)

Requests Now

40

After Optimization

22

The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomascrampton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

thomascrampton.com accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

thomascrampton.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

thomascrampton.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomascrampton.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomascrampton.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thomascrampton. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: