Report Summary

  • 78

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    85% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

thomasfjordside.com

Thomas Fjordside - Frontend developer

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

668 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

234 ms

thomasfjordside.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to thomasfjordside.com homepage info - get ready to check Thomas Fjordside best content right away, or after learning these important things about thomasfjordside.com

Web projects from Thomas Fjordside

Visit thomasfjordside.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Thomasfjordside.com page load time and found that the first response time was 668 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

thomasfjordside.com performance score

78

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

83/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

97/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.2 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value580 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.0 s

53/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

thomasfjordside.com

668 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

169 ms

shortcodes.css

184 ms

styles.css

189 ms

ebor-styles.css

195 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Thomasfjordside.com, 12% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (668 ms) belongs to the original domain Thomasfjordside.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 273.5 kB (44%)

Content Size

624.3 kB

After Optimization

350.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Thomasfjordside.com main page is 624.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 283.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 17.6 kB

  • Original 22.4 kB
  • After minification 22.1 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 21.8 kB

  • Original 258.4 kB
  • After minification 236.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Thomas Fjordside images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-66%

Potential reduce by 186.7 kB

  • Original 283.9 kB
  • After minification 276.3 kB
  • After compression 97.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 186.7 kB or 66% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 47.4 kB

  • Original 59.7 kB
  • After minification 48.1 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Thomasfjordside.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (47%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Thomas Fjordside. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

thomasfjordside.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

thomasfjordside.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

thomasfjordside.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Thomasfjordside.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Thomasfjordside.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Thomas Fjordside. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: