Report Summary

  • 79

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

179 ms

Resources Loaded

1.7 sec

Page Rendered

140 ms

tigo.com.sv screenshot

About Website

Visit tigo.com.sv now to see the best up-to-date Tigo content for El Salvador and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tigo.com.sv

¡Volvemos tu vida smart conectándote al mundo con los mejores Smartphones, servicios residenciales, corporativos, Tigo Money y nuestras apps!

Visit tigo.com.sv

Key Findings

We analyzed Tigo.com.sv page load time and found that the first response time was 179 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tigo.com.sv performance score

79

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

33/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

58/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.3 s

76/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.7 s

90/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tigo.com.sv

179 ms

www.tigo.com.sv

988 ms

system.base.css

16 ms

system.menus.css

20 ms

system.messages.css

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Tigo.com.sv, 11% (11 requests) were made to Tigoweb-prd-cdn.tigocloud.net and 3% (3 requests) were made to Cdn.gigya.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (988 ms) belongs to the original domain Tigo.com.sv.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (42%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

1.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Tigo.com.sv main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 38.4 kB

  • Original 50.4 kB
  • After minification 48.1 kB
  • After compression 12.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.4 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 85.8 kB

  • Original 1.5 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tigo images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 733.3 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 958.0 kB
  • After compression 301.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 733.3 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 501.4 kB

  • Original 601.7 kB
  • After minification 500.5 kB
  • After compression 100.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tigo.com.sv needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 501.4 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 70 (78%)

Requests Now

90

After Optimization

20

The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tigo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 40 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tigo.com.sv accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

tigo.com.sv best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

tigo.com.sv SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    ES

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tigo.com.sv can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Spanish. Our system also found out that Tigo.com.sv main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tigo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: