Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 92

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 80% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 80

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    42% of websites

tineye.com

TinEye Reverse Image Search

Page Load Speed

569 ms in total

First Response

102 ms

Resources Loaded

372 ms

Page Rendered

95 ms

tineye.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to tineye.com homepage info - get ready to check Tin Eye best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about tineye.com

TinEye is an image search and recognition company. We are experts in computer vision, pattern recognition, neural networks, and machine learning.

Visit tineye.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tineye.com page load time and found that the first response time was 102 ms and then it took 467 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tineye.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.1 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,620 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.7 s

56/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tineye.com

102 ms

bootstrap.min.css

33 ms

base.min.css

56 ms

home.min.css

58 ms

jquery-1.11.0.min.js

87 ms

Our browser made a total of 25 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 64% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Tineye.com, 8% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (108 ms) belongs to the original domain Tineye.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 423.3 kB (66%)

Content Size

646.0 kB

After Optimization

222.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Tineye.com main page is 646.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 416.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 11.7 kB

  • Original 15.6 kB
  • After minification 13.9 kB
  • After compression 3.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.7 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.7 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 4.9 kB

  • Original 42.6 kB
  • After minification 37.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Tin Eye needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 266.5 kB

  • Original 416.9 kB
  • After minification 416.9 kB
  • After compression 150.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 266.5 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 140.3 kB

  • Original 170.9 kB
  • After minification 153.6 kB
  • After compression 30.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tineye.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 140.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (30%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

16

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tin Eye. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tineye.com accessibility score

92

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

tineye.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tineye.com SEO score

80

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tineye.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Tineye.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tin Eye. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: