Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

tinpackaging.us

tinpackaging.us

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

141 ms

Resources Loaded

966 ms

Page Rendered

251 ms

tinpackaging.us screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tinpackaging content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tinpackaging.us

US Manufacturer of Metal Packaging

Visit tinpackaging.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Tinpackaging.us page load time and found that the first response time was 141 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tinpackaging.us performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

www.independentcan.com

141 ms

TY5hDsIwCIUv1IpLNN7CKxhG2dbY0qV0Tm8vUbf4732Px4MOqEhDan4oNfsLRKG0BFYgVdD2SqzuDAF1ipbUQ47iTtCM7n157sJ1EMoqqWDwGQVHrp-GoVq9DdfZz2YKPiJswlvAHeEac5_4e8swEt3k3-qAE48orV9iCta7JX-LPKNwAp1KbVT213d8Aw.css

80 ms

M9D3y8xNyknVTy1IzEvN0S_OyC8qSc5PSS3WTy4uRuLGF6UWF-TnFWeWpQIA.css

38 ms

M9RPTSyu1E1LzEuuTMqv0IczsgpLU4sq9WB8XUM9Yz1zvdzMPB0Dfb_M3KScVP3UgsS81Bz9gsT01PiS1NyCnMSS1GI0LgA.css

34 ms

css

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Tinpackaging.us, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (465 ms) relates to the external source Independentcan.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 618.6 kB (15%)

Content Size

4.0 MB

After Optimization

3.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Tinpackaging.us main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 32.4 kB

  • Original 41.3 kB
  • After minification 39.2 kB
  • After compression 8.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 120.8 kB

  • Original 3.3 MB
  • After minification 3.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tinpackaging images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 197.2 kB

  • Original 289.7 kB
  • After minification 266.4 kB
  • After compression 92.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 197.2 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 268.1 kB

  • Original 329.5 kB
  • After minification 251.0 kB
  • After compression 61.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tinpackaging.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 268.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (25%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tinpackaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

tinpackaging.us SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tinpackaging.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Tinpackaging.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tinpackaging. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: