Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    68% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

tmf-dialogue.net

tmf-dialogue

Page Load Speed

12.5 sec in total

First Response

328 ms

Resources Loaded

11.6 sec

Page Rendered

595 ms

tmf-dialogue.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tmf Dialogue content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tmf-dialogue.net

As a MICE market specialist, the company supports convention bureaus, destinations and suppliers, in the development of good relationships with planners.

Visit tmf-dialogue.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Tmf-dialogue.net page load time and found that the first response time was 328 ms and then it took 12.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tmf-dialogue.net performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.3 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value10.1 s

26/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tmf-dialogue.net

328 ms

www.tmf-dialogue.net

9002 ms

css

25 ms

style.css

381 ms

public.css

197 ms

Our browser made a total of 99 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Tmf-dialogue.net, 10% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9 sec) belongs to the original domain Tmf-dialogue.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 793.4 kB (33%)

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Tmf-dialogue.net main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 98.1 kB

  • Original 115.6 kB
  • After minification 104.0 kB
  • After compression 17.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 25.9 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tmf Dialogue images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 170.2 kB

  • Original 275.4 kB
  • After minification 275.3 kB
  • After compression 105.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 170.2 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 499.2 kB

  • Original 591.2 kB
  • After minification 490.5 kB
  • After compression 91.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tmf-dialogue.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 499.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (20%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

64

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tmf Dialogue. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tmf-dialogue.net accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

tmf-dialogue.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

tmf-dialogue.net SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tmf-dialogue.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tmf-dialogue.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tmf Dialogue. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: