5.4 sec in total
345 ms
4.8 sec
261 ms
Click here to check amazing Tntj content for Saudi Arabia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tntj.in
Visit tntj.inWe analyzed Tntj.in page load time and found that the first response time was 345 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
tntj.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.4 s
70/100
10%
Value3.1 s
75/100
25%
Value2.4 s
98/100
10%
Value50 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.029
100/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
345 ms
2376 ms
63 ms
65 ms
67 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tntj.in, 75% (73 requests) were made to Tntj.net and 10% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Tntj.net.
Page size can be reduced by 421.9 kB (51%)
824.4 kB
402.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Tntj.in main page is 824.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 289.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 146.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 146.2 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 17.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tntj images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 164.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 164.3 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 94.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tntj.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 94.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (73%)
93
25
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tntj. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tntj.in
345 ms
www.tntj.net
2376 ms
stylesheet3.css
63 ms
minimal.css
65 ms
slider.css
67 ms
tabs.js
61 ms
heightMatch.js
65 ms
topmenudynamic.js
63 ms
dropdown.js
81 ms
jquery-custom.js
83 ms
clear-input.js
82 ms
user-submitted-posts.css
83 ms
cff-style.css
82 ms
font-awesome.min.css
7 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
83 ms
style.css
100 ms
plugin-styles.css
102 ms
video-js.css
35 ms
frontend-forms.css
103 ms
jquery.js
131 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
110 ms
user-submitted-posts.js
109 ms
jquery.metadata.pack.js
119 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js
123 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js
123 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
132 ms
js
34 ms
frontend-form.js
130 ms
wp-page-numbers.css
138 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js
144 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
145 ms
thickbox.css
149 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
151 ms
thumbnail-slider.js
152 ms
all.js
30 ms
cff-scripts.js
148 ms
conditional-logic.js
154 ms
subscriptions.js
155 ms
video.js
33 ms
vjs.youtube.js
159 ms
calendar.css
116 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
62 ms
fb-img.png
35 ms
tw-img.png
35 ms
moon.png
34 ms
form.png
35 ms
press-news.png
34 ms
fomr.png
34 ms
thamnail.php
300 ms
thamnail.php
300 ms
thamnail.php
300 ms
thamnail.php
299 ms
thamnail.php
298 ms
thamnail.php
299 ms
more.png
1875 ms
onlinepj1.jpg
302 ms
video1.jpg
302 ms
thowheed1.jpg
301 ms
jesus1.jpg
301 ms
Tell.jpg
298 ms
top.gif
299 ms
topx.gif
303 ms
topy.gif
303 ms
searchbutton.gif
301 ms
bannerwithlogo-2.jpg
375 ms
menur.gif
285 ms
menux.gif
358 ms
menuy.gif
357 ms
rssbar.gif
356 ms
rssbary.gif
357 ms
rss.gif
371 ms
rssbarx.gif
371 ms
bg.gif
371 ms
lround.gif
370 ms
tabselector.gif
370 ms
rround.gif
407 ms
closeBigColumn.gif
391 ms
hbullet.gif
332 ms
276 ms
__utm.gif
149 ms
11870673_1035011896517824_9142042508324834369_n.jpg
93 ms
xd_arbiter.php
76 ms
xd_arbiter.php
92 ms
vlcsnap-2016-02-01-16h02m06s169.png
102 ms
vjs.woff
9 ms
like_box.php
89 ms
hDvwL1_H7g-.css
23 ms
udqjbTyb5Ue.css
28 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
27 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
47 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
23 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
24 ms
11870673_1035011896517824_9142042508324834369_n.jpg
46 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
8 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
9 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
9 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
8 ms
tntj.in accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
tntj.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
tntj.in SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tntj.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Tntj.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tntj.in
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tntj. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: