7 sec in total
2.1 sec
4.7 sec
242 ms
Click here to check amazing Touchline content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about touchline.co.uk
We supply custom sportswear & personalised teamwear to clubs UK-wide. With next-gen fabrics & competitive pricing, level-up your team with us today
Visit touchline.co.ukWe analyzed Touchline.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 2.1 sec and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
touchline.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.1 s
0/100
10%
Value14.7 s
0/100
25%
Value20.4 s
0/100
10%
Value250 ms
84/100
30%
Value0.353
31/100
15%
Value14.9 s
8/100
10%
2064 ms
97 ms
178 ms
182 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Touchline.co.uk, 9% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Touchline.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 899.7 kB (44%)
2.1 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Touchline.co.uk main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 125.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Touchline needs image optimization as it can save up to 125.0 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 287.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 287.5 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 434.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Touchline.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 434.1 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (62%)
50
19
The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Touchline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.touchline.co.uk
2064 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
97 ms
styles.css
178 ms
page-list.css
182 ms
css
25 ms
css
38 ms
css
48 ms
style.css
347 ms
shortcodes.css
191 ms
form-basic.min.css
197 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
187 ms
magnific_popup.css
272 ms
jetpack.css
279 ms
jquery.js
380 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
287 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
9 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
290 ms
jquery.form.min.js
377 ms
scripts.js
425 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
7 ms
gprofiles.js
116 ms
wpgroho.js
491 ms
comment-reply.min.js
492 ms
custom.js
491 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
494 ms
waypoints.min.js
492 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
491 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
608 ms
wp-embed.min.js
493 ms
e-201611.js
5 ms
ga.js
117 ms
Touchline_2016-03.jpg
442 ms
TL-Ball-02-e1398284179611.png
659 ms
TL-Ball-RED-02-e1398284225275.png
581 ms
TL-Ball-GREEN-04-04-04-e1398284258664.png
660 ms
TL-Website.jpg
608 ms
blank-05.png
440 ms
Leavers2-19.png
594 ms
Slide-Image-20.png
846 ms
Ski-Slider-Image-21.png
886 ms
School-Trip2.png
1003 ms
Emb-06-06.png
696 ms
Print-07-07.png
743 ms
Custom-08-08.png
742 ms
Tag-05-05.png
784 ms
Brands_2-sec.gif
826 ms
widgets.js
98 ms
Zd2E9abXLFGSr9G3YK2MsKDbm6fPDOZJsR8PmdG62gY.ttf
57 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nJRhFVcex_hajThhFkHyhYk.ttf
56 ms
b9QBgL0iMZfDSpmcXcE8nPOYkGiSOYDq_T7HbIOV1hA.ttf
59 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
835 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xEMwSSh38KQVJx4ABtsZTnA.ttf
55 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xBEM87DM3yorPOrvA-vB930.ttf
60 ms
__utm.gif
311 ms
hovercard.css
183 ms
services.css
217 ms
g.gif
15 ms
touchline.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
touchline.co.uk best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
touchline.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Touchline.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Touchline.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
touchline.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Touchline. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: