Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 53

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 22% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

touchpdf.com

Loading...

Page Load Speed

5.5 sec in total

First Response

216 ms

Resources Loaded

5.1 sec

Page Rendered

129 ms

touchpdf.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Touchpdf content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about touchpdf.com

Touchpdf.com - Online Pdf Editor

Visit touchpdf.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Touchpdf.com page load time and found that the first response time was 216 ms and then it took 5.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

touchpdf.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

touchpdf.com

216 ms

pdf.touchpdf.com

400 ms

theme.css.xhtml

1073 ms

custom.css.xhtml;jsessionid=725C2A403F86BD541DD1C6FDCD5576F1

272 ms

primefaces.css.xhtml;jsessionid=725C2A403F86BD541DD1C6FDCD5576F1

1361 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Touchpdf.com, 80% (28 requests) were made to Pdf.touchpdf.com and 11% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) relates to the external source Pdf.touchpdf.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 745.7 kB (64%)

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

420.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Touchpdf.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 820.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-45%

Potential reduce by 218 B

  • Original 489 B
  • After minification 443 B
  • After compression 271 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 218 B or 45% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 44.1 kB

  • Original 236.3 kB
  • After minification 192.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Touchpdf needs image optimization as it can save up to 44.1 kB or 19% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 610.1 kB

  • Original 820.2 kB
  • After minification 772.4 kB
  • After compression 210.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 610.1 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 91.4 kB

  • Original 109.0 kB
  • After minification 96.1 kB
  • After compression 17.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Touchpdf.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 91.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (56%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

15

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Touchpdf. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

touchpdf.com accessibility score

53

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

touchpdf.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

touchpdf.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Touchpdf.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Touchpdf.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Touchpdf. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: