7.8 sec in total
336 ms
6.1 sec
1.4 sec
Welcome to tradesignal.com homepage info - get ready to check Tradesignal best content right away, or after learning these important things about tradesignal.com
Now available through Trayport, Tradesignal is a leading analysis tool with numerous functions for traders operating in the energy markets.
Visit tradesignal.comWe analyzed Tradesignal.com page load time and found that the first response time was 336 ms and then it took 7.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
tradesignal.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.7 s
0/100
10%
Value14.1 s
0/100
25%
Value10.5 s
7/100
10%
Value590 ms
50/100
30%
Value0.096
91/100
15%
Value13.9 s
10/100
10%
336 ms
347 ms
2403 ms
196 ms
246 ms
Our browser made a total of 95 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Tradesignal.com, 85% (81 requests) were made to Tradesignal.trayport.com and 11% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) relates to the external source Tradesignal.trayport.com.
Page size can be reduced by 170.8 kB (19%)
912.7 kB
741.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Tradesignal.com main page is 912.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 592.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 166.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 166.7 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 580 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tradesignal images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tradesignal.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (84%)
79
13
The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tradesignal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 45 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tradesignal.com
336 ms
347 ms
tradesignal.trayport.com
2403 ms
wpcf7-blacklist-public.css
196 ms
styles.css
246 ms
style.min.css
265 ms
style.min.css
182 ms
front.min.css
193 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
230 ms
style.css
256 ms
accordion.css
264 ms
basics.css
253 ms
blurb.css
266 ms
cta.css
277 ms
fonts.css
301 ms
footer.css
330 ms
newsletter.css
323 ms
parallax.css
322 ms
portfolio.css
349 ms
slider.css
361 ms
textblock.css
374 ms
zitate.css
396 ms
reports.css
401 ms
blog.css
402 ms
logos.css
436 ms
sitenav.css
450 ms
productfeatures.css
447 ms
_seofix.css
469 ms
basics.css
464 ms
textblock.css
465 ms
slider.css
510 ms
blurb.css
511 ms
portfolio.css
522 ms
cta.css
533 ms
parallax.css
543 ms
zitate.css
542 ms
accordion.css
591 ms
reports.css
577 ms
api.js
74 ms
newsletter.css
593 ms
footer.css
548 ms
blog.css
509 ms
logos.css
489 ms
style.css
537 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
497 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
484 ms
style.css
476 ms
jquery.min.js
563 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
509 ms
wpcf7-blacklist-public.js
536 ms
titans.js
499 ms
frontend-bundle.min.js
498 ms
widget.js
572 ms
app.js
685 ms
front.min.js
550 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
558 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
526 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
505 ms
index.js
518 ms
scripts.min.js
1094 ms
smoothscroll.js
539 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
526 ms
jquery.mobile.js
545 ms
common.js
1017 ms
index.js
1010 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1009 ms
mediaelement-migrate.min.js
965 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.js
963 ms
hit
1228 ms
Trayport_id_tag-EN-POS-RGB.png
201 ms
tradeesignal-td-bw-03.jpg
719 ms
Portfolio-Handelsstrategien-324x216-scharf.jpg
205 ms
Home-Back-Test-330x220.png
200 ms
Home-M%C3%A4rkte-Scannen-330x220.png
203 ms
Home-Programmieren-330x220.png
202 ms
Home-Charts-330x220.png
200 ms
Home-Datenprovider-330x220.png
244 ms
tradeesignal-blog-bw-04.jpg
394 ms
tradeesignal-blog-bw-05.jpg
440 ms
roboto-condensed-400-normal-9K7Cw.woff
143 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4k.woff
124 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0C4n.ttf
179 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4k.woff
174 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0C4n.ttf
168 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4k.woff
168 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1y4n.ttf
168 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4k.woff
172 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1y4n.ttf
172 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4k.woff
171 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1y4n.ttf
171 ms
modules.ttf
212 ms
Xing.woff
486 ms
et-divi-dynamic-2-late.css
210 ms
recaptcha__en.js
167 ms
style.min.css
171 ms
tradesignal.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
tradesignal.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
tradesignal.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tradesignal.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Tradesignal.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tradesignal.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tradesignal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: