624 ms in total
49 ms
418 ms
157 ms
Welcome to trafficg.com homepage info - get ready to check TrafficG best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about trafficg.com
Visit trafficg.comWe analyzed Trafficg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 49 ms and then it took 575 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.
trafficg.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.7 s
93/100
10%
Value1.7 s
99/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value1,170 ms
21/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.4 s
60/100
10%
49 ms
3 ms
14 ms
55 ms
112 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Trafficg.com, 16% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (222 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.plus500.com.
Page size can be reduced by 564.0 kB (68%)
827.9 kB
263.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Trafficg.com main page is 827.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 635.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 112.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TrafficG images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 436.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 436.0 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trafficg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 14.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 24 (57%)
42
18
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TrafficG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
trafficg.com
49 ms
upg4.css
3 ms
news.js
14 ms
addthis_widget.js
55 ms
inads.php
112 ms
13869.gif
222 ms
widgets.js
152 ms
plusone.js
135 ms
logo2.gif
22 ms
yeltop.gif
18 ms
search2.gif
22 ms
main_super_wide2.jpg
93 ms
BottomCol1Back.gif
93 ms
Main2.jpg
97 ms
menu-topr.gif
25 ms
LinkSeparator.gif
98 ms
_blank.gif
98 ms
menu-right.gif
97 ms
menu-left.gif
92 ms
menu-blank.gif
97 ms
menu-down2.gif
97 ms
join-now-free.png
99 ms
More.gif
116 ms
BottomCol2Back2.gif
98 ms
taf.jpg
125 ms
hosting.jpg
125 ms
inads.php
60 ms
300lo.json
39 ms
bigbottom.jpg
35 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
23 ms
967226f5d22908b3743bb9d6b978acf2.gif
68 ms
clixsense468x60a.gif
100 ms
layers.3643cb2e25fb91c29386.js
33 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
27 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
61 ms
fastbutton
114 ms
button.831500944bc3eb7ea5276ccdc3f71d2e.js
149 ms
postmessageRelay
56 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
13 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
13 ms
grlryt2bdKIyfMSOhzd1eA.woff
39 ms
api.js
32 ms
core:rpc:shindig.random:shindig.sha1.js
55 ms
2536007149-postmessagerelay.js
48 ms
trafficg.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
<input type="image"> elements do not have [alt] text
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
trafficg.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
trafficg.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trafficg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Trafficg.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
trafficg.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of TrafficG. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: