Report Summary

  • 68

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    80% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 81

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    43% of websites

triketalk.com

News - The Front Page

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

442 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

839 ms

triketalk.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Triketalk content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about triketalk.com

Trike Talk Latest News

Visit triketalk.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Triketalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 442 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

triketalk.com performance score

68

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

25/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

73/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value60 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

79/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

442 ms

yuiloader-dom-event.js

31 ms

vbulletin-core.js

62 ms

css.php

189 ms

css.php

138 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Triketalk.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to I854.photobucket.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Triketalk.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 792.8 kB (34%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Triketalk.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 177.6 kB

  • Original 197.3 kB
  • After minification 163.0 kB
  • After compression 19.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 34.3 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 177.6 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 40.0 kB

  • Original 1.4 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Triketalk images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 252.1 kB

  • Original 349.0 kB
  • After minification 296.8 kB
  • After compression 96.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 252.1 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 323.1 kB

  • Original 384.7 kB
  • After minification 351.6 kB
  • After compression 61.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Triketalk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 323.1 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (31%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

51

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Triketalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

triketalk.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

triketalk.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

triketalk.com SEO score

81

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Triketalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Triketalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Triketalk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: