Tools & Wizards About Us
trimtechnique.co.uk screenshot

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 69

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 35% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

trimtechnique.co.uk

Trim Technique – A professional trim repair service to both the public and motor industry

Page Load Speed

4.4 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

225 ms

trimtechnique.co.uk screenshot

About Website

Visit trimtechnique.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Trim Technique content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about trimtechnique.co.uk

Visit trimtechnique.co.uk

Key Findings

We analyzed Trimtechnique.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

trimtechnique.co.uk performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

17/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

35/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.351

31/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.5 s

47/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

trimtechnique.co.uk

1087 ms

admin_icon.min.css

85 ms

wp-customer-reviews.css

162 ms

style.min.css

308 ms

styles.css

236 ms

Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Trimtechnique.co.uk, 6% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Trimtechnique.co.uk.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 180.0 kB (27%)

Content Size

678.0 kB

After Optimization

498.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Trimtechnique.co.uk main page is 678.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 277.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 80.2 kB

  • Original 108.5 kB
  • After minification 107.2 kB
  • After compression 28.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.2 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 40.8 kB
  • After minification 40.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Trim Technique images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 37.3 kB

  • Original 251.4 kB
  • After minification 251.4 kB
  • After compression 214.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 37.3 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 62.5 kB

  • Original 277.3 kB
  • After minification 277.2 kB
  • After compression 214.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Trimtechnique.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 62.5 kB or 23% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (86%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

6

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trim Technique. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 22 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

trimtechnique.co.uk

trimtechnique.co.uk

1087 ms

admin_icon.min.css

admin_icon.min.css

85 ms

wp-customer-reviews.css

wp-customer-reviews.css

162 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

308 ms

styles.css

styles.css

236 ms

cookie-law-info-public.css

cookie-law-info-public.css

237 ms

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

cookie-law-info-gdpr.css

237 ms

style.css

style.css

240 ms

js_composer.min.css

js_composer.min.css

401 ms

css

css

35 ms

main.min.css

main.min.css

484 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

313 ms

fontello.min.css

fontello.min.css

316 ms

post-type.css

post-type.css

317 ms

custom-c8b94ad90e.css

custom-c8b94ad90e.css

458 ms

media-c8b94ad90e.css

media-c8b94ad90e.css

392 ms

post-type-dynamic-c8b94ad90e.css

post-type-dynamic-c8b94ad90e.css

394 ms

style.css

style.css

390 ms

jquery-1.12.4-wp.js

jquery-1.12.4-wp.js

523 ms

jquery-migrate-1.4.1-wp.js

jquery-migrate-1.4.1-wp.js

539 ms

wp-customer-reviews.js

wp-customer-reviews.js

542 ms

cookie-law-info-public.js

cookie-law-info-public.js

544 ms

above-the-fold.min.js

above-the-fold.min.js

545 ms

v4-shims.min.css

v4-shims.min.css

593 ms

all.min.css

all.min.css

653 ms

style.css

style.css

655 ms

css

css

26 ms

counter-list.css

counter-list.css

654 ms

main.min.js

main.min.js

664 ms

index.js

index.js

664 ms

index.js

index.js

664 ms

post-type.js

post-type.js

664 ms

smush-lazy-load.min.js

smush-lazy-load.min.js

663 ms

js_composer_front.min.js

js_composer_front.min.js

664 ms

init.min.js

init.min.js

789 ms

counter-script.js

counter-script.js

790 ms

css

css

15 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

98 ms

fontello.woff

fontello.woff

320 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

320 ms

ga.js

ga.js

31 ms

collect

collect

100 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

51 ms

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

jquery.mousewheel.min.js

194 ms

fa-regular-400.woff

fa-regular-400.woff

185 ms

fa-solid-900.woff

fa-solid-900.woff

189 ms

logo.png

logo.png

82 ms

mobile-and-number.jpg

mobile-and-number.jpg

82 ms

Accessibility Review

trimtechnique.co.uk accessibility score

69

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

SEO Factors

trimtechnique.co.uk SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trimtechnique.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Trimtechnique.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

trimtechnique.co.uk

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Trim Technique. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: