Report Summary

  • 95

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    93% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

Page Load Speed

1.9 sec in total

First Response

701 ms

Resources Loaded

1.1 sec

Page Rendered

109 ms

trinafan.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to trinafan.com homepage info - get ready to check Trinafan best content right away, or after learning these important things about trinafan.com

This website is for sale! trinafan.com is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, trinafan.com has...

Visit trinafan.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Trinafan.com page load time and found that the first response time was 701 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

trinafan.com performance score

95

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.9 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.167

71/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ww1.trinafan.com

701 ms

jquery.min.js

5 ms

logo_blue.png

41 ms

portal.php

109 ms

rl.php

116 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Trinafan.com, 25% (2 requests) were made to Img.sedoparking.com and 25% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (701 ms) relates to the external source Ww1.trinafan.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 45.7 kB (44%)

Content Size

102.7 kB

After Optimization

57.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Trinafan.com main page is 102.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 52.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 41.5 kB

  • Original 52.4 kB
  • After minification 50.2 kB
  • After compression 10.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.5 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-47%

Potential reduce by 3.6 kB

  • Original 7.8 kB
  • After minification 4.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Trinafan needs image optimization as it can save up to 3.6 kB or 47% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 550 B

  • Original 42.5 kB
  • After minification 42.5 kB
  • After compression 42.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

7

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 7 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Trinafan. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

trinafan.com accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best Practices

trinafan.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

trinafan.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Trinafan.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Trinafan.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Trinafan. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: