5.3 sec in total
498 ms
3.8 sec
966 ms
Visit truecontact.me now to see the best up-to-date Truecontact content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about truecontact.me
True Contact is the best choice you can have to resolve all those unknown calls you receive and do not know whether to take or reject.
Visit truecontact.meWe analyzed Truecontact.me page load time and found that the first response time was 498 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
truecontact.me performance score
498 ms
265 ms
203 ms
137 ms
25 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Truecontact.me, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Truecontact.me.
Page size can be reduced by 292.3 kB (19%)
1.5 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Truecontact.me main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 29.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.7 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 29.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 135 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Truecontact images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 79.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 79.6 kB or 38% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 183.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Truecontact.me needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 183.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 28 (50%)
56
28
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Truecontact. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
truecontact.me
498 ms
bootstrap.min.css
265 ms
style.css
203 ms
styles.css
137 ms
css
25 ms
owl.theme.css
138 ms
owl.carousel.css
142 ms
nivo-lightbox.css
143 ms
default.css
204 ms
animate.min.css
340 ms
styles.css
283 ms
blue.css
214 ms
responsive.css
270 ms
jquery.min.js
21 ms
jwplayer.html
271 ms
js
28 ms
gmap3.min.js
154 ms
bootstrap.min.js
377 ms
smoothscroll.js
268 ms
jquery.scrollTo.min.js
275 ms
jquery.localScroll.min.js
276 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
376 ms
nivo-lightbox.min.js
378 ms
simple-expand.min.js
390 ms
wow.min.js
390 ms
jquery.stellar.min.js
389 ms
retina.min.js
389 ms
jquery.nav.js
389 ms
matchMedia.js
404 ms
jquery.ajaxchimp.min.js
451 ms
custom.js
451 ms
map-homepage.js
464 ms
photo.jpg
420 ms
uFp_tsTJboUY7kue5XAsGA=w48-c-h48
78 ms
photo.jpg
297 ms
loading.gif
193 ms
bg-1.jpg
556 ms
logo-2.png
183 ms
icn_key.png
195 ms
login-logo.png
193 ms
logo_white_transparent.png
200 ms
true-caller-top-banner.png
416 ms
single-trucaller.png
393 ms
truecontact-users-usa.png
2284 ms
true-caller-contact-banner.png
399 ms
bg-2.jpg
485 ms
call-log-hand.jpg
594 ms
desktop-recent-files.jpg
534 ms
mobile-attachments-tn.jpg
483 ms
mobile-menu-tn.jpg
552 ms
about-hand.png
2970 ms
bg-3.jpg
942 ms
icn_download1.png
619 ms
iphone-2-mock.png
767 ms
blackberry-incoming-call.png
801 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
36 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
46 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
57 ms
lanenar_Lane.svg
701 ms
lanenar_Lane.woff
770 ms
app-icons.woff
788 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf
58 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf
59 ms
ElegantIcons.svg
1087 ms
ElegantIcons.ttf
903 ms
truecontact.me SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Truecontact.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Truecontact.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
truecontact.me
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Truecontact. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: