Tools & Wizards About Us
tu-get.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 74

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    83% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 68% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

tu-get.net

新莆京app官网下载8883旧版(2023已更新)ios/安卓/手机版app下载

Page Load Speed

8.3 sec in total

First Response

296 ms

Resources Loaded

5.7 sec

Page Rendered

2.2 sec

tu-get.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tu Get content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tu-get.net

新莆京app官网下载8883旧版是一家专业的在线游戏平台,拥有AG真人娱乐、体育在线投注、彩票、老虎机等等火爆游戏供大家玩耍,天天送豪礼。

Visit tu-get.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Tu-get.net page load time and found that the first response time was 296 ms and then it took 8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tu-get.net performance score

74

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

32/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.05

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.6 s

91/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tu-get.net

296 ms

1557 ms

blocks.style.build.css

294 ms

chaty-front.min.css

588 ms

style.min.css

862 ms

Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tu-get.net, 84% (61 requests) were made to Chulatutor.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) relates to the external source Chulatutor.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 186.0 kB (57%)

Content Size

325.5 kB

After Optimization

139.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Tu-get.net main page is 325.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 221.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 183.6 kB

  • Original 221.4 kB
  • After minification 217.4 kB
  • After compression 37.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 183.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 2.4 kB

  • Original 104.0 kB
  • After minification 101.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tu Get images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (78%)

Requests Now

67

After Optimization

15

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tu Get. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

tu-get.net

tu-get.net

296 ms

1557 ms

blocks.style.build.css

blocks.style.build.css

294 ms

chaty-front.min.css

chaty-front.min.css

588 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

862 ms

styles.css

styles.css

863 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

863 ms

screen.min.css

screen.min.css

865 ms

style.css

style.css

849 ms

foundation.min.css

foundation.min.css

880 ms

slick.css

slick.css

1139 ms

css

css

73 ms

style.css

style.css

1346 ms

layerslider.css

layerslider.css

1319 ms

layerslider.origami.css

layerslider.origami.css

1324 ms

layerslider.popup.css

layerslider.popup.css

1332 ms

css

css

97 ms

addthis_wordpress_public.min.css

addthis_wordpress_public.min.css

1324 ms

wp-paginate.css

wp-paginate.css

1428 ms

cht-front-script.min.js

cht-front-script.min.js

1649 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

1615 ms

html5shiv.min.js

html5shiv.min.js

65 ms

respond.min.js

respond.min.js

74 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

1616 ms

magnific-popup.min.js

magnific-popup.min.js

1631 ms

app.js

app.js

1616 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

1696 ms

app.build.js

app.build.js

1970 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

1970 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

1972 ms

index.js

index.js

1970 ms

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

gtm4wp-form-move-tracker.js

1971 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

77 ms

greensock.js

greensock.js

2524 ms

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js

2724 ms

layerslider.transitions.js

layerslider.transitions.js

2186 ms

layerslider.origami.js

layerslider.origami.js

2201 ms

layerslider.popup.js

layerslider.popup.js

2209 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

2214 ms

jquery.smooth-scroll.min.js

jquery.smooth-scroll.min.js

2479 ms

js.cookie.min.js

js.cookie.min.js

2507 ms

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

jquery.sticky-kit.min.js

2502 ms

front.min.js

front.min.js

2510 ms

lazyload.min.js

lazyload.min.js

2546 ms

phone.webp

phone.webp

1357 ms

arrow.png

arrow.png

1369 ms

placeholder.svg

placeholder.svg

1368 ms

cu-tep-3.webp

cu-tep-3.webp

1389 ms

toeic-1.webp

toeic-1.webp

1572 ms

ielts-1.webp

ielts-1.webp

1624 ms

ged-1.webp

ged-1.webp

1658 ms

sat-2.webp

sat-2.webp

1663 ms

cu-best-1.webp

cu-best-1.webp

1659 ms

-W__XJnvUD7dzB2KYNoY.ttf

-W__XJnvUD7dzB2KYNoY.ttf

107 ms

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Ck_kIaWMr.ttf

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Ck_kIaWMr.ttf

230 ms

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cy_gIaWMr.ttf

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cy_gIaWMr.ttf

248 ms

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cv_4IaWMr.ttf

-W_8XJnvUD7dzB2Cv_4IaWMr.ttf

248 ms

bg.png

bg.png

1496 ms

address.webp

address.webp

1691 ms

mail.webp

mail.webp

1739 ms

phone.webp

phone.webp

1794 ms

youtube.png

youtube.png

1183 ms

hqdefault.jpg

hqdefault.jpg

115 ms

en.png

en.png

76 ms

chula-mobile-logo.png

chula-mobile-logo.png

628 ms

chula-desktop-logo.png

chula-desktop-logo.png

624 ms

email.jpg

email.jpg

811 ms

w_fb.png

w_fb.png

855 ms

w_tw.png

w_tw.png

906 ms

w_ig.png

w_ig.png

915 ms

w_ln.png

w_ln.png

912 ms

w_yt.png

w_yt.png

918 ms

up-arrow.webp

up-arrow.webp

1093 ms

Accessibility Review

tu-get.net accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

tu-get.net best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

tu-get.net SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    TH

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tu-get.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Thai language. Our system also found out that Tu-get.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

tu-get.net

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tu Get. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: