4.8 sec in total
961 ms
3.7 sec
194 ms
Click here to check amazing TulipX content for Australia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tulipx.com
Visit tulipx.comWe analyzed Tulipx.com page load time and found that the first response time was 961 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
tulipx.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
24/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value4.0 s
81/100
10%
Value730 ms
41/100
30%
Value0.079
94/100
15%
Value8.4 s
39/100
10%
961 ms
260 ms
25 ms
874 ms
372 ms
Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Tulipx.com, 15% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Tulipx.com.
Page size can be reduced by 306.5 kB (45%)
682.0 kB
375.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Tulipx.com main page is 682.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 286.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.1 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. TulipX images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 140.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 140.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 155.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tulipx.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 155.2 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (67%)
15
5
The browser has sent 15 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of TulipX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tulipx.com
961 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
260 ms
css
25 ms
bootstrap.css
874 ms
font-awesome.css
372 ms
style.css
589 ms
jquery.js
902 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
186 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
239 ms
masonry.min.js
687 ms
jquery.assets.js
628 ms
tdmacro.js
432 ms
wp-embed.min.js
491 ms
34230287919b706bf7bc6345b77ba272
99 ms
IMG_3784.jpg
1787 ms
P1011183.jpg
1527 ms
ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlFzCdIATDt8zXO3QNtzVeJ8.ttf
59 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGGvd-IutAbwf5FQ8ZpuI2w4.ttf
60 ms
toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGGAlZ1PukdtTN2z-JxSzbe8.ttf
61 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
638 ms
tulipx.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
tulipx.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
tulipx.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tulipx.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tulipx.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tulipx.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of TulipX. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: