Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

tulsacrossing.com

Jobs in Tulsa, Oklahoma | Tulsa Employment | EmploymentCrossing.com

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

245 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

606 ms

tulsacrossing.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tulsa Crossing content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tulsacrossing.com

Search jobs in Tulsa, Oklahoma and find new job openings for your job category, job title in Tulsa, Oklahoma on EmploymentCrossing.com.

Visit tulsacrossing.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tulsacrossing.com page load time and found that the first response time was 245 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tulsacrossing.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

38/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

63/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,670 ms

4/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.118

85/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.0 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

l-Tulsa-OK-jobs.html

245 ms

l-tulsa-ok-jobs.html

935 ms

jquery.min.js

4 ms

jquery-migrate-1.2.1.min.js

20 ms

bootstrap.min_20150130010109.js

275 ms

Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Tulsacrossing.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Images3.employmentcrossing.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Media.employmentscape.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (935 ms) relates to the external source Employmentcrossing.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 2.1 MB (72%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

838.3 kB

In fact, the total size of Tulsacrossing.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 247.3 kB

  • Original 275.9 kB
  • After minification 231.0 kB
  • After compression 28.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 44.9 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 247.3 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 4.7 kB

  • Original 175.1 kB
  • After minification 170.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tulsa Crossing images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 1.4 MB

  • Original 2.0 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB
  • After compression 552.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.4 MB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 426.7 kB

  • Original 513.4 kB
  • After minification 432.4 kB
  • After compression 86.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tulsacrossing.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 426.7 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (65%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tulsa Crossing. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tulsacrossing.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

tulsacrossing.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

tulsacrossing.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tulsacrossing.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tulsacrossing.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tulsa Crossing. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: