6.3 sec in total
1.7 sec
3.5 sec
1.1 sec
Welcome to tunheim.com homepage info - get ready to check Tunheim best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about tunheim.com
Over 30 years of results in public relations, public affairs, digital marketing and corporate communications.
Visit tunheim.comWe analyzed Tunheim.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
tunheim.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
9/100
10%
Value7.6 s
3/100
25%
Value12.6 s
3/100
10%
Value1,300 ms
18/100
30%
Value0.217
57/100
15%
Value18.8 s
3/100
10%
1680 ms
61 ms
122 ms
131 ms
143 ms
Our browser made a total of 101 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Tunheim.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to T.sharethis.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Tunheim.com.
Page size can be reduced by 896.5 kB (24%)
3.7 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Tunheim.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 214.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 214.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 82.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tunheim images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 414.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 414.2 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 186.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tunheim.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 186.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 62 (67%)
93
31
The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tunheim. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
tunheim.com
1680 ms
reset.css
61 ms
style.css
122 ms
jquery.fullPage.css
131 ms
prefixfree.min.js
143 ms
modernizr-2.8.0.dev.js
163 ms
style.css
153 ms
style.css
155 ms
style.css
183 ms
style.css
185 ms
style.css
214 ms
style.css
229 ms
style.css
231 ms
slidedeck.css
232 ms
picturefill.min.js
240 ms
jquery.min.js
44 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
244 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
296 ms
slidedeck.jquery.js
307 ms
slidedeck-public.js
402 ms
widgets.js
9 ms
buttons.js
10 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
58 ms
jquery.slimscroll.min.js
308 ms
jquery.fullPage.js
318 ms
conversion.js
20 ms
comment-reply.js
303 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
389 ms
jquery.cycle2.carousel.min.js
380 ms
jquery.cycle2.swipe.min.js
378 ms
jquery.cycle2.tile.min.js
387 ms
jquery.cycle2.video.min.js
373 ms
script.js
430 ms
script.js
435 ms
script.js
456 ms
script.js
453 ms
client.js
476 ms
functions.js
476 ms
font-awesome.min.css
397 ms
reset.css
63 ms
style.css
288 ms
jquery.fullPage.css
276 ms
style.css
248 ms
style.css
237 ms
style.css
267 ms
style.css
260 ms
style.css
325 ms
style.css
339 ms
style.css
333 ms
slidedeck.css
345 ms
tunheim_text.png
339 ms
visitor.gif
388 ms
logo.png
331 ms
tunheim_white.png
383 ms
metaplusbook-roman-webfont.woff
398 ms
metaplusbold_roman-webfont.woff
404 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
491 ms
analytics.js
41 ms
283 ms
mural.jpg
515 ms
down_arrow.png
382 ms
157964362-1200x800.jpg
597 ms
schneider_electric_logo-300x88.png
457 ms
Stadium-Exterior_Front_norseman.CURRENT-1300x647.jpg
683 ms
MN-Sports-Facility-187x125.png
457 ms
160110672-1066x800.jpg
735 ms
Assn-of-MN-Counties-187x125.png
531 ms
187456420.jpg
650 ms
Greater-MSP2-187x125.png
577 ms
slide_03.jpg
1198 ms
158909210-1146x800.jpg
737 ms
ThinkstockPhotos-187974988-1200x800.jpg
758 ms
483171893-774x800.jpg
819 ms
ThinkstockPhotos-526369037.jpg
788 ms
people.jpg
957 ms
iprex_logo.png
778 ms
sdk.js
295 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
156 ms
collect
83 ms
collect
134 ms
slider_arrows.png
624 ms
meta-normal-regular-webfont.woff
658 ms
reset.css
612 ms
91 ms
ga-audiences
32 ms
getSegment.php
172 ms
checkOAuth.esi
257 ms
26 ms
xd_arbiter.php
134 ms
xd_arbiter.php
275 ms
t.dhj
58 ms
t.dhj
33 ms
cm
55 ms
x35248
122 ms
s-3271.xgi
31 ms
hbpix
45 ms
pixel
25 ms
5 ms
xrefid.xgi
8 ms
2981
24 ms
7 ms
tunheim.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
tunheim.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
tunheim.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tunheim.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tunheim.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
tunheim.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tunheim. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: