Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    71% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 63% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    82% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

txt.cm

txt.cm

Page Load Speed

29 sec in total

First Response

2.8 sec

Resources Loaded

26 sec

Page Rendered

113 ms

txt.cm screenshot

About Website

Welcome to txt.cm homepage info - get ready to check Txt best content right away, or after learning these important things about txt.cm

This domain may be for sale!

Visit txt.cm

Key Findings

We analyzed Txt.cm page load time and found that the first response time was 2.8 sec and then it took 26.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

txt.cm performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

36/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.7 s

69/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value500 ms

58/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.224

56/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

79/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

txt.cm

2831 ms

jquery.js

20442 ms

stat.php

1545 ms

stat.htm

163 ms

core.php

550 ms

Our browser made a total of 8 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Txt.cm, 13% (1 request) were made to Libs.baidu.com and 13% (1 request) were made to S44.cnzz.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.4 sec) relates to the external source Libs.baidu.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 8.5 kB (63%)

Content Size

13.5 kB

After Optimization

5.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Txt.cm main page is 13.5 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 10.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-59%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 2.8 kB
  • After minification 2.3 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 560 B, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 59% of the original size.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 6.9 kB

  • Original 10.7 kB
  • After minification 10.7 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 6.9 kB or 64% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

5

After Optimization

5

The browser has sent 5 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Txt. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

txt.cm accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

txt.cm best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

txt.cm SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Txt.cm can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Txt.cm main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Txt. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: