7.2 sec in total
551 ms
6.5 sec
170 ms
Welcome to typequick.com homepage info - get ready to check Typequick best content for Switzerland right away, or after learning these important things about typequick.com
TYPEQUICK - Proven Learn to Touch Type Software
Visit typequick.comWe analyzed Typequick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 551 ms and then it took 6.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
typequick.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value4.8 s
30/100
25%
Value7.1 s
31/100
10%
Value10 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.025
100/100
15%
Value5.7 s
68/100
10%
551 ms
1305 ms
476 ms
1219 ms
478 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (44 requests) were addressed to the original Typequick.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Typequick.com.
Page size can be reduced by 195.0 kB (39%)
506.0 kB
310.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Typequick.com main page is 506.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 298.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Typequick needs image optimization as it can save up to 52.8 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 90.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 90.8 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Typequick.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.9 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (59%)
44
18
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Typequick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
typequick.com
551 ms
www.typequick.com
1305 ms
moopopup03.css
476 ms
mootools.js
1219 ms
caption.js
478 ms
mooMessageBox.js
478 ms
style.css
494 ms
system.css
723 ms
general.css
949 ms
template.css
953 ms
reset.css
477 ms
layout.css
478 ms
menus.css
496 ms
modules.css
497 ms
typo.css
731 ms
ga.js
28 ms
logo.png
473 ms
tq_header_banner.png
942 ms
bg-menu.png
475 ms
tq_navi_leftcurv_hover.png
475 ms
tq_navi_rightcurv_hover.png
474 ms
tq_navi_leftcurv.png
477 ms
tq_navi_rightcurv.png
944 ms
bg-container.png
945 ms
container_top.png
947 ms
container.png
948 ms
tq_main_banner.png
1890 ms
bg-s4-module.png
1415 ms
bg-s3-h3-left.png
1452 ms
bg-s3-h3-right.png
1433 ms
title.gif
1450 ms
login.png
1443 ms
bg-s3-module.png
1890 ms
bg-hblue-left.png
1908 ms
bg-hblue-right.png
1916 ms
box_tqpro.png
2160 ms
tq_blue_bn_button.png
1928 ms
visa_37x23.gif
2374 ms
mastercard_37x23.gif
2372 ms
paypal_37x23.gif
2381 ms
box_tqstud.png
2626 ms
box_tqpro_trynow.png
2637 ms
box_tqstud_trynow.png
2634 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
container_bottom.png
2816 ms
bg-footer.png
2814 ms
typequick.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
typequick.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
typequick.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Typequick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Typequick.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
typequick.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Typequick. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: