3.5 sec in total
835 ms
2.5 sec
139 ms
Visit typographymaker.com now to see the best up-to-date Typographymaker content for Iran and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about typographymaker.com
Typographymaker.com / Online free typography generator
Visit typographymaker.comWe analyzed Typographymaker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 835 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
typographymaker.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value3.2 s
73/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.18
67/100
15%
Value3.1 s
95/100
10%
835 ms
504 ms
500 ms
586 ms
53 ms
Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Typographymaker.com, 11% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 11% (2 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (996 ms) belongs to the original domain Typographymaker.com.
Page size can be reduced by 382.2 kB (70%)
548.3 kB
166.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Typographymaker.com main page is 548.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 378.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 915 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Typographymaker needs image optimization as it can save up to 915 B or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 248.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 248.7 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 104.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Typographymaker.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 104.5 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 9 (56%)
16
7
The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Typographymaker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
typographymaker.com
835 ms
bootstrap.min.css
504 ms
style.css
500 ms
whatever.js
586 ms
analytics.js
53 ms
icons.png
251 ms
collect
27 ms
jquery-ui-1.10.4.custom.css
261 ms
font-LeagueGothicRegular.css
293 ms
jquery.min.js
42 ms
fabric.1.4.7.min.js
996 ms
jquery-ui-resizable.js
446 ms
bootstrap.min.js
452 ms
sdk.js
158 ms
147 ms
xd_arbiter.php
160 ms
xd_arbiter.php
262 ms
bebasneue-webfont.woff
589 ms
League_Gothic-webfont.woff
502 ms
typographymaker.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
typographymaker.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
typographymaker.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Typographymaker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Typographymaker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
typographymaker.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Typographymaker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: