4.8 sec in total
845 ms
2.9 sec
1.1 sec
Visit efront.uservoice.com now to see the best up-to-date EFront Uservoice content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about efront.uservoice.com
Visit efront.uservoice.comWe analyzed Efront.uservoice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 845 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
efront.uservoice.com performance score
845 ms
193 ms
74 ms
320 ms
45 ms
Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Efront.uservoice.com, 29% (11 requests) were made to Assets1.uvcdn.com and 26% (10 requests) were made to Assets0.uvcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (960 ms) relates to the external source Secure.gravatar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 457.8 kB (72%)
632.8 kB
175.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Efront.uservoice.com main page is 632.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 289.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 206.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 206.4 kB or 90% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EFront Uservoice images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 186.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 186.3 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Efront.uservoice.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (65%)
34
12
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EFront Uservoice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
efront.uservoice.com
845 ms
efront.uservoice.com
193 ms
efront.uservoice.com
74 ms
31924-efront-community
320 ms
site2-eb1cac8c3ade4552bb656dbedcf1fc1f.css
45 ms
site2-a5dedce594a4d36b32a37cbe171531f2.js
215 ms
ga.js
583 ms
eFront_final_logo_small_4162_0.png
530 ms
signin_throbber-f8363010f580e2dde8c55280c84d9f11.gif
514 ms
f64fe22e637060937ff453aa021dbc7c
960 ms
signin_reset-652cd1801cde58a3994b3f98dea3a662.png
473 ms
black-70opacity-cee389dd0e8ab0ce18eff8f94351ee34.png
474 ms
facebook-0ae32c6b9db8433da3bff920000995f0.png
473 ms
tab-selected-c2c3d3cf09884d1f72123b2f16ef0dd4.png
472 ms
password-fb2771112fb14e2588f5beba6b59fb95.png
473 ms
google-fb06110d524fe305438f815805d6d649.png
474 ms
powered_by_background-b1e690e45a3b88d7c105d031a87027f7.png
477 ms
powered_by_bullhorn.24px-a112248680463feb72a7a0f318b947cf.png
477 ms
icon.home.24px-606914b7f1fdca4344964019ef60cc04.png
479 ms
body_background-6e838f79846cc44b4268470bbb74a7cd.png
319 ms
10-24970ab6a4ac15c6228bc3e2b1335b1f.png
372 ms
google-fb06110d524fe305438f815805d6d649.png
371 ms
password-fb2771112fb14e2588f5beba6b59fb95.png
371 ms
facebook-0ae32c6b9db8433da3bff920000995f0.png
369 ms
icon.search.16px-cfce09bbf3fecdea315d219558598330.png
411 ms
icon.sidebar-search.24px-298cfb09447f78a0659231225c607dda.png
418 ms
icon.idea.24px-a783bf1ed8cf8ae43ca2451384f637da.png
467 ms
f64fe22e637060937ff453aa021dbc7c
860 ms
all.js
299 ms
hoCXrCey68b8L7YmCUvppg.js
494 ms
mixpanel.js
280 ms
close_reversed-355be84359c1c31ee8ed5b8bf066b1c1.png
155 ms
__utm.gif
35 ms
45 ms
123 ms
xd_arbiter.php
42 ms
track.js
189 ms
xd_arbiter.php
13 ms
efront.uservoice.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efront.uservoice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Efront.uservoice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
efront.uservoice.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EFront Uservoice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: