Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

efront.uservoice.com

eFront Community (160 ideas) – Customer Feedback for efront

Page Load Speed

4.8 sec in total

First Response

845 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

efront.uservoice.com screenshot

About Website

Visit efront.uservoice.com now to see the best up-to-date EFront Uservoice content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about efront.uservoice.com

Visit efront.uservoice.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Efront.uservoice.com page load time and found that the first response time was 845 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

efront.uservoice.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

efront.uservoice.com

845 ms

efront.uservoice.com

193 ms

efront.uservoice.com

74 ms

31924-efront-community

320 ms

site2-eb1cac8c3ade4552bb656dbedcf1fc1f.css

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 11% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Efront.uservoice.com, 29% (11 requests) were made to Assets1.uvcdn.com and 26% (10 requests) were made to Assets0.uvcdn.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (960 ms) relates to the external source Secure.gravatar.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 457.8 kB (72%)

Content Size

632.8 kB

After Optimization

175.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Efront.uservoice.com main page is 632.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 289.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 206.4 kB

  • Original 228.6 kB
  • After minification 206.7 kB
  • After compression 22.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 206.4 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 1.9 kB

  • Original 35.4 kB
  • After minification 33.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. EFront Uservoice images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 186.3 kB

  • Original 289.7 kB
  • After minification 289.7 kB
  • After compression 103.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 186.3 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 63.1 kB

  • Original 79.1 kB
  • After minification 78.8 kB
  • After compression 16.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Efront.uservoice.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (65%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

12

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of EFront Uservoice. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

SEO Factors

efront.uservoice.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Efront.uservoice.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Efront.uservoice.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of EFront Uservoice. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: