1.6 sec in total
73 ms
876 ms
601 ms
Click here to check amazing Fonts Useco content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fonts.useco.com
Pair is a website hosting company with over 25 years of experience, 99.9% server uptime, and a variety of powerful web hosting plans available, all backed by 24/7, friendly tech support from real empl...
Visit fonts.useco.comWe analyzed Fonts.useco.com page load time and found that the first response time was 73 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
fonts.useco.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value8.9 s
15/100
10%
Value1,020 ms
26/100
30%
Value0.004
100/100
15%
Value13.7 s
11/100
10%
73 ms
149 ms
156 ms
24 ms
17 ms
Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Fonts.useco.com, 68% (56 requests) were made to Pair.com and 26% (21 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (430 ms) relates to the external source Pair.com.
Page size can be reduced by 183.5 kB (32%)
569.3 kB
385.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Fonts.useco.com main page is 569.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 200.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 169.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 169.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Fonts Useco needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.7 kB or 93% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 7.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fonts.useco.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (93%)
55
4
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fonts Useco. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fonts.useco.com
73 ms
pair.com
149 ms
www.pair.com
156 ms
tp.widget.bootstrap.min.js
24 ms
1708022303-css70e639e7bcbc91bbb51ae632441c32fcbbc1373736095e15d45b848332758.css
17 ms
1708022303-css21c6a32bbefed7355863d1f9fca6a84f436009915d8b244e15b2d9d6000dd.css
39 ms
1708022303-css51dd8267ae40ddb9750bd92f3475c5f4b93d8e873040f474ebd78a58db60b.css
47 ms
1708022303-css40a8cad5b4b65d227618af4b0502dbe74711f91b7d52007fd429a6058d3d2.css
63 ms
1708022303-cssa4a8b9c648d11ff7f62de5ee139948d08bd729dd237a3714b05872fbf9bb9.css
50 ms
1708022303-cssd9ef8c81abb8d536e2f9844e9043e1af0798b8ad89973add774d84a802df4.css
76 ms
1708022303-css3c324ad52ae2fd2c2153471d58d19369f41db00ac89f01441543e619a2e33.css
51 ms
1708022303-csscc63cd1f06061d8f268dd0a63a61388b70e4238ee4577a640720f76f73d5c.css
53 ms
1708022303-cssb5e384b01e3dbef557fcdfdcf39bc77b7cf54fb9a922a08bfdcac55b5f01a.css
58 ms
1708022303-css8a454c81f239bc869c58f3072b54af12866d825458ff1f10d3b762ec10e93.css
86 ms
1708022303-cssccb191191f33a462fb177cd9deb481768b585c2f9e03067137ea976b84405.css
74 ms
1708022303-cssa5fe88a038e5e75a582579d12cca0b6092dfdf2477bf0dbd865780dac7ddd.css
76 ms
1708022303-css6542afe389ef3e990ecc23733c47147adf260c03e91d0aad3990215d06a12.css
75 ms
1708022303-csse5eddce2f958137e0fb799375b58844d821818d7973cc8eff3da549b58a25.css
77 ms
1708022303-css39af9e8a10c6aa06a6d4f7dee7fc144c306bb1241a8183466cac06a55c4d4.css
118 ms
1708022303-css2d38d140f83c348ca0b33b9a6e6ff2c60446ee76fb60f3e3ea94bc3720991.css
96 ms
1708022303-cssb0db6b47d312de0f6325d9fc2c18f0c73448a253d48c414c286d4033abbbb.css
109 ms
1708022303-css5159c9387577f2437f40f6c70024f0120e95a60b891a5555673c006520335.css
114 ms
1708022303-css2d2dea6f51d5a1ee76c316effb1bce625d9af019ae4b3c93e96842e51b5cf.css
112 ms
1708022303-css8f2a1b64ce718b105d5a673ab6d6bdd93cbad9d186f33f88d5cef992cc1e5.css
115 ms
1708022303-css23de685768d3c7b9c3fdd4ab5d81d5cf273e958fa76ca9a9e56190caf404e.css
110 ms
1708022303-cssf2c5951763a2a41a46ab7adcaa6646d37b5a66360cbbe9558180700b9c37b.css
129 ms
1708022303-cssb991dfbeb85afcd928543aea23326d231868c0b3b51bd46df6f291cc991aa.css
131 ms
1708022303-css49b9208a7326d41b05a5d25c6bf2f6cc3cb25576f07c7cb7852c3e4d676ba.css
130 ms
jquery.min.js
142 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
139 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
140 ms
v4-shims.min.js
140 ms
optimize.js
47 ms
1708022303-csseb44ea5e61b6654a913681a2feb1bb6e612b87faba887966c6e798268c826.css
138 ms
cookie-law-info-controls-public.js
206 ms
accordion-custom.js
207 ms
accordion.js
213 ms
rmp-menu.js
214 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
215 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
216 ms
lc.js
33 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
333 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
330 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
307 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
300 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
297 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
295 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
294 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
430 ms
hooks.min.js
293 ms
i18n.min.js
281 ms
frontend.min.js
278 ms
waypoints.min.js
278 ms
core.min.js
276 ms
frontend.min.js
303 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
273 ms
tag.js
265 ms
pair_shadow_02.png
166 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxM.woff
154 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc-.woff
170 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc-.woff
215 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzQ.woff
215 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc-.woff
216 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc-.woff
216 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuFuYAZ9hjg.woff
83 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuDyYAZ9hjg.woff
82 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuBWYAZ9hjg.woff
81 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuGKYAZ9hjg.woff
84 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuI6fAZ9hjg.woff
85 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyfAZ9hjg.woff
84 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuOKfAZ9hjg.woff
85 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuDyfAZ9hjg.woff
85 ms
UcCO3FwrK3iLTeHuS_fvQtMwCp50KnMw2boKoduKmMEVuLyeAZ9hjg.woff
85 ms
font
86 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgshZ1x4gaVQ.woff
88 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVQ.woff
88 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVQ.woff
86 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVQ.woff
85 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVQ.woff
88 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
87 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
61 ms
Libsyn_Pair_Logo-scaled.webp
81 ms
fonts.useco.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
fonts.useco.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
fonts.useco.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fonts.useco.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fonts.useco.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fonts.useco.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fonts Useco. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: