2 sec in total
189 ms
1.4 sec
354 ms
Click here to check amazing Packaging Ubuntu content for China. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about packaging.ubuntu.com
Welcome to the Ubuntu Packaging and Development Guide! This is the official place for learning all about Ubuntu Development and packaging. After reading this guide you will have: Heard about the mo...
Visit packaging.ubuntu.comWe analyzed Packaging.ubuntu.com page load time and found that the first response time was 189 ms and then it took 1.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
packaging.ubuntu.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.3 s
98/100
10%
Value1.3 s
100/100
25%
Value1.4 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value1.3 s
100/100
10%
189 ms
426 ms
536 ms
388 ms
148 ms
Our browser made a total of 24 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Packaging.ubuntu.com, 46% (11 requests) were made to Developer.ubuntu.com and 25% (6 requests) were made to Assets.ubuntu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (656 ms) relates to the external source Assets.ubuntu.com.
Page size can be reduced by 505.4 kB (69%)
736.9 kB
231.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Packaging.ubuntu.com main page is 736.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 348.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.7 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 4.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Packaging Ubuntu images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 197.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 197.7 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 294.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Packaging.ubuntu.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 294.4 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (65%)
20
7
The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Packaging Ubuntu. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
packaging.ubuntu.com
189 ms
ubuntu-styles.css
426 ms
styles.css
536 ms
global-responsive.css
388 ms
home.css
148 ms
yui-combined.min.js
612 ms
global.js
387 ms
scratch.js
399 ms
icon-mail.png
187 ms
icon-twitter.png
189 ms
logo-ubuntu-orange.svg
459 ms
icon-google-plus.png
464 ms
icon-irc.png
479 ms
icon-facebook.png
494 ms
f8a323a7-image-background-paper.png
656 ms
background-header-home.png
124 ms
dotted-logo.png
158 ms
26a786aa-logo-ubuntu-white.svg
425 ms
c88fbee7-soft-centre-bkg.gif
452 ms
0194407b-ubuntu-l-webfont.woff
513 ms
81863185-ubuntu-r-webfont.woff
598 ms
4d80ab6d-ubuntu-b-webfont.woff
633 ms
combo
22 ms
core-print.css
95 ms
packaging.ubuntu.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
packaging.ubuntu.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
packaging.ubuntu.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Packaging.ubuntu.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Packaging.ubuntu.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
packaging.ubuntu.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Packaging Ubuntu. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: