1.4 sec in total
135 ms
990 ms
258 ms
Visit udesignstone.com now to see the best up-to-date U Design Stone content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about udesignstone.com
United Design Stone has the finest selection of Natural Stone Slabs, Tiles, Columns, Balustrades, Medallions in the south.
Visit udesignstone.comWe analyzed Udesignstone.com page load time and found that the first response time was 135 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
udesignstone.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.9 s
25/100
10%
Value9.0 s
1/100
25%
Value8.0 s
22/100
10%
Value270 ms
82/100
30%
Value0.13
81/100
15%
Value8.9 s
34/100
10%
135 ms
8 ms
88 ms
115 ms
196 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Udesignstone.com, 28% (20 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (656 ms) belongs to the original domain Udesignstone.com.
Page size can be reduced by 233.9 kB (24%)
963.7 kB
729.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Udesignstone.com main page is 963.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 687.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.5 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.2 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 167.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, U Design Stone needs image optimization as it can save up to 167.3 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 38.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 38.9 kB or 21% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Udesignstone.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.4 kB or 14% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (84%)
49
8
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of U Design Stone. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
udesignstone.com
135 ms
analytics.js
8 ms
bootstrap.css
88 ms
jpreloader.css
115 ms
animate.css
196 ms
plugin.css
117 ms
owl.carousel.css
117 ms
owl.theme.css
182 ms
owl.transitions.css
183 ms
magnific-popup.css
172 ms
style.css
199 ms
bg.css
169 ms
color.css
248 ms
font-awesome.css
277 ms
style.css
279 ms
style.css
275 ms
settings.css
289 ms
rev-settings.css
275 ms
jquery.min.js
323 ms
jpreLoader.js
327 ms
bootstrap.min.js
329 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
335 ms
easing.js
329 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
341 ms
jquery.scrollto.js
376 ms
owl.carousel.js
382 ms
jquery.countTo.js
381 ms
classie.js
381 ms
video.resize.js
387 ms
validation.js
432 ms
wow.min.js
430 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
441 ms
enquire.min.js
434 ms
designesia.js
442 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
483 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
488 ms
logo1.png
632 ms
pic_4.jpg
656 ms
collect
35 ms
js
153 ms
logo2.png
542 ms
css
50 ms
css
75 ms
css
65 ms
yellow.css
254 ms
css
27 ms
css
28 ms
font-style-2.css
94 ms
dot-70.png
54 ms
bg-3.jpg
214 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjr0B4gaVc.ttf
25 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4gaVc.ttf
37 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4gaVc.ttf
48 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4gaVc.ttf
52 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4gaVc.ttf
52 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJabMl2xMB.ttf
58 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ml2xMB.ttf
51 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJN7Ml2xMB.ttf
50 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJBbMl2xMB.ttf
65 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ6bQl2xMB.ttf
65 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJ0LQl2xMB.ttf
66 ms
HhyJU5sn9vOmLxNkIwRSjTVNWLEJt7Ql2xMB.ttf
66 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
125 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvaorCIPrQ.ttf
67 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVvoorCIPrQ.ttf
66 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVuEorCIPrQ.ttf
74 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVsEpbCIPrQ.ttf
82 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVs9pbCIPrQ.ttf
83 ms
1Ptxg8zYS_SKggPN4iEgvnHyvveLxVtzpbCIPrQ.ttf
83 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
82 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
81 ms
udesignstone.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
udesignstone.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
udesignstone.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Udesignstone.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Udesignstone.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
udesignstone.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of U Design Stone. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: