13.4 sec in total
1.1 sec
11.6 sec
738 ms
Welcome to udtalk.com homepage info - get ready to check Udtalk best content for Thailand right away, or after learning these important things about udtalk.com
ยูดีทอล์ดอทคอม สังคมออนไลน์ของคนอุดรธานี หางานอุดร, ที่ดินอุดร, เมเจอร์อุดร, อุดรเอฟซี, ขายบ้านอุดรธานี
Visit udtalk.comWe analyzed Udtalk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 12.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.
udtalk.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
20/100
10%
Value4.1 s
46/100
25%
Value4.1 s
78/100
10%
Value790 ms
37/100
30%
Value0.102
89/100
15%
Value7.0 s
53/100
10%
1054 ms
522 ms
542 ms
543 ms
823 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 36% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Udtalk.com, 20% (15 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net and 13% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (9.2 sec) relates to the external source Matichon.co.th.
Page size can be reduced by 406.3 kB (26%)
1.6 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Udtalk.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 51.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 51.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Udtalk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 287.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 287.5 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Udtalk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 61.3 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 40 (57%)
70
30
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Udtalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
udtalk.com
1054 ms
screen.css
522 ms
style.css
542 ms
jd.gallery.css
543 ms
mootools-1.2.1-core-yc.js
823 ms
mootools-1.2-more.js
550 ms
jd.gallery.js
567 ms
jd.gallery.transitions.js
1045 ms
jquery.min.js
8 ms
jquery.nailthumb.1.0.min.js
454 ms
mootools-1.2.1-core-yc.js
1351 ms
MenuMatic.css
1083 ms
MenuMatic_0.68.3.js
1116 ms
tracker.php
536 ms
945077_462819210462349_2005094172_n.jpg
290 ms
qudor.jpg
305 ms
iconnew.gif
913 ms
EyWwB5WU57MYnKOuX7GJLQ5O7MijOq8xY9euBgliO3hira0gCvfcR3.jpg
1138 ms
14503449171450345013l.jpg
9217 ms
%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%B3%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%A3.jpg
3960 ms
no_picture.png
905 ms
banner-horeca-challenge-2015_zpsqa8wssoc.jpg
590 ms
EhSEoI.jpg
634 ms
ads_120_120.gif
728 ms
rss.png
594 ms
facebook.png
592 ms
twitter.png
594 ms
search.gif
599 ms
logo.png
600 ms
date.png
599 ms
user.png
1131 ms
edit.png
1131 ms
arrow.gif
1133 ms
OHelyx.jpg
637 ms
newflash-iframe.php
890 ms
h2bg.png
1091 ms
header.jpg
1649 ms
menu.png
1096 ms
content.png
1535 ms
footer.png
1555 ms
likebox.php
212 ms
tracker.js
786 ms
kyEKgjk51ZE.css
24 ms
xgj7bXhJNEH.css
29 ms
1kPfZUdGrka.js
37 ms
Yuj_Y8xNH2C.js
74 ms
Mpe38fuBVZ2.js
71 ms
n8qIhCw3vMx.js
71 ms
10420026_732623476815253_7521932472889203148_n.jpg
105 ms
385469_212181408859465_1070366890_n.jpg
49 ms
3612_1697100360537636_6545641094368314041_n.jpg
103 ms
600416_968874043181371_7014229547988966583_n.jpg
164 ms
1930702_194306867611757_8042885522818779234_n.jpg
50 ms
1919670_1618219411737946_9220934051084810060_n.jpg
53 ms
944970_222484208105180_6518077811603156577_n.jpg
75 ms
1469999_169781996742344_4015401603690212914_n.jpg
163 ms
1935834_837873296359302_3525490340819365298_n.jpg
113 ms
12540966_458511897685146_2794338385860517342_n.jpg
61 ms
941314_992830097451906_4311549230551926606_n.jpg
62 ms
1656004_1312524672106712_3719801131195928760_n.jpg
62 ms
44557_172567736434147_3282155327589584985_n.jpg
125 ms
600382_759704687515409_5545724937293403949_n.jpg
93 ms
12688106_476531832555610_2252245929447068076_n.jpg
158 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
41 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
42 ms
EhSEoI.jpg
1171 ms
OHelyx.jpg
579 ms
VXcANLwwL5J.js
3 ms
AmlxWlqMvlv.js
12 ms
style.css
568 ms
functional.css
583 ms
jquery-1.11.2.min.js
912 ms
flowplayer.min.js
933 ms
stat.gif
266 ms
print.css
523 ms
fpicons.woff
608 ms
udtalk.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
udtalk.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
udtalk.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Udtalk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Udtalk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
udtalk.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Udtalk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: