4.1 sec in total
193 ms
3.8 sec
115 ms
Click here to check amazing Ultimate Look content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ultimatelook.net
Visit ultimatelook.netWe analyzed Ultimatelook.net page load time and found that the first response time was 193 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
ultimatelook.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.3 s
3/100
10%
Value7.3 s
5/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value520 ms
56/100
30%
Value0.691
7/100
15%
Value7.4 s
49/100
10%
193 ms
470 ms
67 ms
62 ms
37 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (52 requests) were addressed to the original Ultimatelook.net, 3% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Maps.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (628 ms) belongs to the original domain Ultimatelook.net.
Page size can be reduced by 134.1 kB (5%)
2.8 MB
2.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Ultimatelook.net main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.3 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 28.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ultimate Look images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 76.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 76.3 kB or 26% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ultimatelook.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.1 kB or 34% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (58%)
55
23
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ultimate Look. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ultimatelook.net
193 ms
www.ultimatelook.net
470 ms
style.css
67 ms
js
62 ms
swfobject.js
37 ms
colorpicker.css
136 ms
screen.css
246 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
194 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
192 ms
grid.css
201 ms
css
45 ms
style.min.css
314 ms
jquery.min.js
319 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
258 ms
jquery.ui.js
375 ms
colorpicker.js
264 ms
jquery.fancybox.pack.js
314 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
324 ms
jquery.easing.js
330 ms
jquery.touchwipe.1.1.1.js
390 ms
gmap.js
385 ms
jquery.validate.js
385 ms
browser.js
386 ms
jquery.backstretch.js
393 ms
hint.js
442 ms
jquery.flip.min.js
459 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
463 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
517 ms
kenburns.js
458 ms
jwplayer.js
628 ms
jquery.ppflip.js
507 ms
custom.js
522 ms
wp-embed.min.js
523 ms
screen.css
464 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
67 ms
ga.js
26 ms
logo.png
67 ms
facebook.png
69 ms
linkedin.png
66 ms
3y9I6aknfjLm_3lMKjiMgmUUYBs04aUXNxt9gW2LIfto9tWZd2GP.ttf
28 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
ON-051-UL2-678x1024.jpg
127 ms
Brenda-print-028-678x1024.jpg
182 ms
TT-017-680x1024.jpg
199 ms
AG-045-UL-678x1024.jpg
198 ms
CG-014UL-678x1024.jpg
197 ms
JF-027-UL-678x1024.jpg
198 ms
2-Krismin-0679-UL-678x1024.jpg
199 ms
LH-041-UL-678x1024.jpg
308 ms
JD-033-UL-678x1024.jpg
309 ms
Niki-041-UL-678x1024.jpg
308 ms
AB-044UL-688x1024.jpg
311 ms
SW-hat-008UL-678x1024.jpg
369 ms
Zorana-004-UL-678x1024.jpg
275 ms
Giana-015-UL-678x1024.jpg
369 ms
EG-print-059UL-1024x678.jpg
400 ms
GT-029-UL-678x1024.jpg
400 ms
VC-041-UL-678x1024.jpg
401 ms
ultimatelook.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ultimatelook.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ultimatelook.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ultimatelook.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ultimatelook.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ultimatelook.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ultimate Look. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: