Tools & Wizards About Us
ultrarichmatch.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 40

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    60% of other websites

  • 64

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

129 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

600 ms

ultrarichmatch.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to ultrarichmatch.com homepage info - get ready to check Ultra Rich Match best content right away, or after learning these important things about ultrarichmatch.com

Visit ultrarichmatch.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Ultrarichmatch.com page load time and found that the first response time was 129 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

ultrarichmatch.com performance score

40

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.3 s

75/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

45/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,550 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

ultrarichmatch.com

129 ms

css

37 ms

jquery.min.js

134 ms

jquery.dropotron.js

97 ms

config.js

103 ms

Our browser made a total of 85 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (65 requests) were addressed to the original Ultrarichmatch.com, 12% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (542 ms) belongs to the original domain Ultrarichmatch.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 579.6 kB (39%)

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

887.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Ultrarichmatch.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 699.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 18.6 kB

  • Original 25.6 kB
  • After minification 21.4 kB
  • After compression 7.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.2 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.6 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 52.4 kB

  • Original 665.6 kB
  • After minification 613.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ultra Rich Match images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 444.5 kB

  • Original 699.0 kB
  • After minification 681.0 kB
  • After compression 254.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 444.5 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 64.0 kB

  • Original 77.2 kB
  • After minification 53.3 kB
  • After compression 13.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ultrarichmatch.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 64.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (39%)

Requests Now

69

After Optimization

42

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ultra Rich Match. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

ultrarichmatch.com

ultrarichmatch.com

129 ms

css

css

37 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

134 ms

jquery.dropotron.js

jquery.dropotron.js

97 ms

config.js

config.js

103 ms

skel.min.js

skel.min.js

94 ms

skel-panels.min.js

skel-panels.min.js

110 ms

jsValidation.js

jsValidation.js

98 ms

api.js

api.js

50 ms

style.css

style.css

160 ms

style-desktop.css

style-desktop.css

156 ms

style-1000px.css

style-1000px.css

162 ms

recaptcha__en.js

recaptcha__en.js

119 ms

s.html

s.html

96 ms

banner.jpg

banner.jpg

200 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

191 ms

shadow.png

shadow.png

120 ms

urm_android.png

urm_android.png

101 ms

urm_apple.png

urm_apple.png

101 ms

pic02.jpg

pic02.jpg

218 ms

TimesOfIndia_Ultra_Rich_Match.jpg

TimesOfIndia_Ultra_Rich_Match.jpg

223 ms

Youtube.jpg

Youtube.jpg

188 ms

B.svg

B.svg

209 ms

A.svg

A.svg

267 ms

index.html

index.html

82 ms

s.html

s.html

198 ms

index.html

index.html

193 ms

ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlEY6Fu39Tt9XkmtSosaMoEA.ttf

ODelI1aHBYDBqgeIAH2zlEY6Fu39Tt9XkmtSosaMoEA.ttf

27 ms

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLlcMrNrsnL9dgADnXgYJjs.ttf

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGLlcMrNrsnL9dgADnXgYJjs.ttf

31 ms

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGAB1T86lWSAA4YH0UgcWDqc.ttf

toadOcfmlt9b38dHJxOBGAB1T86lWSAA4YH0UgcWDqc.ttf

48 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

272 ms

M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoMzpKUtbt71woJ25xl7KOGD0.ttf

M2Jd71oPJhLKp0zdtTvoMzpKUtbt71woJ25xl7KOGD0.ttf

47 ms

fallback

fallback

25 ms

fallback__ltr.css

fallback__ltr.css

5 ms

css

css

14 ms

logo_48.png

logo_48.png

2 ms

QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf

QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf

2 ms

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

2 ms

demo.css

demo.css

113 ms

component.css

component.css

114 ms

modernizr.custom.js

modernizr.custom.js

111 ms

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js

91 ms

masonry.pkgd.min.js

masonry.pkgd.min.js

90 ms

classie.js

classie.js

186 ms

cbpGridGallery.js

cbpGridGallery.js

186 ms

demo.css

demo.css

191 ms

style.css

style.css

189 ms

css

css

13 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

24 ms

jquery.eislideshow.js

jquery.eislideshow.js

185 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

185 ms

AA.jpg

AA.jpg

257 ms

1.jpg

1.jpg

288 ms

2.jpg

2.jpg

300 ms

3.jpg

3.jpg

288 ms

4.jpg

4.jpg

294 ms

A.png

A.png

273 ms

css

css

15 ms

1.png

1.png

174 ms

2.png

2.png

201 ms

3.png

3.png

215 ms

4.png

4.png

223 ms

leela.png

leela.png

207 ms

bluemoon.png

bluemoon.png

213 ms

joyalukkas.png

joyalukkas.png

289 ms

cameracrew.png

cameracrew.png

330 ms

milind.png

milind.png

337 ms

7.png

7.png

326 ms

11.png

11.png

331 ms

12.png

12.png

311 ms

13.png

13.png

393 ms

14.png

14.png

394 ms

fernsnpetals.png

fernsnpetals.png

426 ms

16.png

16.png

417 ms

5.png

5.png

418 ms

6.png

6.png

459 ms

8.png

8.png

488 ms

lakme.png

lakme.png

447 ms

JB.png

JB.png

471 ms

1EqTbJWOZQBfhZ0e3RL9uvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

1EqTbJWOZQBfhZ0e3RL9uvesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf

9 ms

0DeoTBMnW4sOpD0Zb8OQSALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf

0DeoTBMnW4sOpD0Zb8OQSALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf

11 ms

MZ1aViPqjfvZwVD_tzjjkwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf

MZ1aViPqjfvZwVD_tzjjkwLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf

11 ms

fontawesome.woff

fontawesome.woff

542 ms

reset.css

reset.css

495 ms

gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xGtXp_56cyzG87rk01y3A5nr7w4p9aSvGirXi6XmeXNA.ttf

gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xGtXp_56cyzG87rk01y3A5nr7w4p9aSvGirXi6XmeXNA.ttf

25 ms

Accessibility Review

ultrarichmatch.com accessibility score

64

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

High

<object> elements do not have alternate text

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

ultrarichmatch.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

ultrarichmatch.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ultrarichmatch.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ultrarichmatch.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

ultrarichmatch.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ultra Rich Match. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: