Tools & Wizards About Us
uma-talk.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 35

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    55% of other websites

  • 90

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 75% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

Page Load Speed

4.9 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

525 ms

uma-talk.com screenshot

About Website

Visit uma-talk.com now to see the best up-to-date Uma Talk content for Japan and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about uma-talk.com

Visit uma-talk.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Uma-talk.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

uma-talk.com performance score

35

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

19/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

31/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.8 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,570 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

uma-talk.com

1344 ms

common.css

343 ms

layout.css

344 ms

design.css

872 ms

mobile.css

544 ms

Our browser made a total of 29 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Uma-talk.com, 10% (3 requests) were made to Umatalk.analytics.qlook.net and 7% (2 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Uma-talk.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 191.9 kB (74%)

Content Size

258.8 kB

After Optimization

66.8 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Uma-talk.com main page is 258.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 143.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 36.1 kB

  • Original 44.6 kB
  • After minification 42.3 kB
  • After compression 8.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 943 B

  • Original 3.3 kB
  • After minification 2.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Uma Talk needs image optimization as it can save up to 943 B or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 97.3 kB

  • Original 143.4 kB
  • After minification 142.4 kB
  • After compression 46.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 97.3 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 57.6 kB

  • Original 67.4 kB
  • After minification 46.0 kB
  • After compression 9.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Uma-talk.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 57.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (57%)

Requests Now

28

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Uma Talk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

uma-talk.com

uma-talk.com

1344 ms

common.css

common.css

343 ms

layout.css

layout.css

344 ms

design.css

design.css

872 ms

mobile.css

mobile.css

544 ms

mobile_layout.css

mobile_layout.css

377 ms

advanced.css

advanced.css

655 ms

pagenavi-css.css

pagenavi-css.css

512 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

1365 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

751 ms

analyze.js

analyze.js

606 ms

utility.js

utility.js

359 ms

socialButton.js

socialButton.js

399 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

497 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

662 ms

keiba_3rentan88_31.gif

keiba_3rentan88_31.gif

590 ms

counter.png

counter.png

589 ms

bg-top.png

bg-top.png

286 ms

icon-arrow_r.png

icon-arrow_r.png

286 ms

bg-sub-h3.png

bg-sub-h3.png

286 ms

icon-arrow06.png

icon-arrow06.png

285 ms

analyze.png

analyze.png

512 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

13 ms

platform.js

platform.js

262 ms

sdk.js

sdk.js

224 ms

print.css

print.css

168 ms

156 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

154 ms

xd_arbiter.php

xd_arbiter.php

275 ms

Accessibility Review

uma-talk.com accessibility score

90

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

uma-talk.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

uma-talk.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    JA

  • Language Claimed

    JA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Uma-talk.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Uma-talk.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

uma-talk.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Uma Talk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: