Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 72

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

281 ms

Resources Loaded

3.7 sec

Page Rendered

560 ms

urlchecker.net screenshot

About Website

Visit urlchecker.net now to see the best up-to-date Urlchecker content for Iran and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about urlchecker.net

Urlcher link check decode that supports all popular file hosts, such as Rapidshare,mediafire,mega,Rapidgator,Easy-share,DepositFiles,Netload,adf.ly and many more.

Visit urlchecker.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Urlchecker.net page load time and found that the first response time was 281 ms and then it took 4.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

urlchecker.net performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.4 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

urlchecker.org

281 ms

bootstrap.min.css

14 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

69 ms

font-awesome.min.css

64 ms

proxy.css

54 ms

Our browser made a total of 144 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Urlchecker.net, 6% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 5% (7 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) relates to the external source Apis.google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (57%)

Content Size

2.7 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Urlchecker.net main page is 2.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 232.0 kB

  • Original 292.0 kB
  • After minification 245.6 kB
  • After compression 60.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 46.3 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 232.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 213.7 kB

  • Original 734.9 kB
  • After minification 521.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Urlchecker needs image optimization as it can save up to 213.7 kB or 29% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 1.0 MB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB
  • After compression 564.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 122.3 kB

  • Original 150.9 kB
  • After minification 150.6 kB
  • After compression 28.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Urlchecker.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 122.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 86 (63%)

Requests Now

136

After Optimization

50

The browser has sent 136 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Urlchecker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

urlchecker.net accessibility score

72

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

urlchecker.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

urlchecker.net SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Urlchecker.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Urlchecker.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Urlchecker. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: