8.7 sec in total
278 ms
8.1 sec
301 ms
Click here to check amazing Usable Efficiency content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about usable-efficiency.com
Improving Websites does exactly what it says on the tin! Short video tutorials to help you build better websites
Visit usable-efficiency.comWe analyzed Usable-efficiency.com page load time and found that the first response time was 278 ms and then it took 8.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster. This domain responded with an error, which can significantly jeopardize Usable-efficiency.com rating and web reputation
usable-efficiency.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
26/100
10%
Value4.4 s
40/100
25%
Value3.8 s
83/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.035
100/100
15%
Value4.0 s
88/100
10%
278 ms
1111 ms
135 ms
266 ms
261 ms
Our browser made a total of 48 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Usable-efficiency.com, 52% (25 requests) were made to Webpayload.com and 13% (6 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) relates to the external source Webpayload.com.
Page size can be reduced by 564.4 kB (47%)
1.2 MB
644.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Usable-efficiency.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 726.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 60.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 60.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Usable Efficiency images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 441.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 441.3 kB or 61% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Usable-efficiency.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.1 kB or 68% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (53%)
34
16
The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Usable Efficiency. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
usable-efficiency.com
278 ms
www.webpayload.com
1111 ms
1722140034.js
135 ms
518f82045a4a828d42aabecb7a47a3c7eed757ef.1438862896.css
266 ms
bsg1wso.js
261 ms
ff64758447782b2ecd4fea6d84704dfd0d5f8fed.1419701785.js
487 ms
highcharts.js
32 ms
highcharts-3d.js
52 ms
highcharts-more.js
44 ms
high-charts-theme.js
260 ms
event
220 ms
www.webpayload.com
214 ms
logo.png
164 ms
a-href_500_500_80_c1.jpg
373 ms
type_500_500_80_c1.jpg
371 ms
cta-poster-2_500_500_80_c1.jpg
370 ms
karl-blanks_500_500_80_c1.jpg
370 ms
harry-roberts-poster_500_500_80_c1.jpg
371 ms
tim-k-poster_500_500_80_c1.jpg
438 ms
gerry-mcgovern-poster_500_500_80_c1.jpg
605 ms
book.png
636 ms
sprites.png
463 ms
bg-4x1.png
330 ms
518f82045a4a828d42aabecb7a47a3c7eed757ef.1438862896.css
264 ms
www.webpayload.com
40 ms
css
66 ms
pdua8q7bMRHPcZ4u_5GQyn4dM3RABg0dgbDi850hrKMffJfkggMWeMJ6Mk6f5M9.woff
74 ms
UIYMwGx0LuWrDD3emvxaFPrUhyg43RStBk7HR2IeLLCffHPsgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5Mb.woff
74 ms
gPj0djVu1JBjQJslz39e6n4fQZxyz6--jy1-K-qqan6ff4kQgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5MS.woff
196 ms
pdua8q7bMRHPcZ4u_5GQyn4dM3RABg0dgbDi850hrKMffJfkggMWeMJ6Mk6f5M9.woff
2251 ms
UIYMwGx0LuWrDD3emvxaFPrUhyg43RStBk7HR2IeLLCffHPsgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5Mb.woff
2261 ms
gPj0djVu1JBjQJslz39e6n4fQZxyz6--jy1-K-qqan6ff4kQgsMWeMJ6Mk6f5MS.woff
2223 ms
woopra.js
111 ms
piwik.js
602 ms
ga.js
108 ms
w.js
106 ms
css
65 ms
clickstream.min.js
63 ms
__utm.gif
17 ms
136 ms
storage.luckyorange.net
74 ms
settings.luckyorange.net
33 ms
l4u-nWK0s_Fb5Uku8Epcj2WDQYa2L1OOb995S-Mtbavff4kQgsMWeMJ6MP6f5MS.otf
1632 ms
Lq37e4ICsFpsBw9efCh-wa2tHov-jf6OoVFR4aNhFNbffJfkggMWeMJ6MP6f5M9.otf
1859 ms
_e_nJGIA61Igp18OIxeXerNM0_70BTO88kF6MYl_qCMffHPsgsMWeMJ6MP6f5Mb.otf
1849 ms
nQhUjU30M1Zbqxp8qMzMKqZOGCvKjVNXPUPjE5amMdIff4kQgsMWeMI6MP6f5MS.otf
1712 ms
sNDqxPpEZzLG1HU1nXLm8wYYmJ-IJb2N4zI-yW0YAQIffHPsgsMWeMI6MP6f5Mb.otf
1781 ms
bwF6ltksNsXjgQFBGttkmyL6Ogq4eppyPd7eS8m1BqIffJfkggMWeMI6MP6f5M9.otf
1787 ms
usable-efficiency.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
usable-efficiency.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
usable-efficiency.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Usable-efficiency.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Usable-efficiency.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
usable-efficiency.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Usable Efficiency. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: