3 sec in total
112 ms
2.4 sec
579 ms
Click here to check amazing Usfor content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about usfor.com
Quality Online Printing
Visit usfor.comWe analyzed Usfor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 112 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
usfor.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.0 s
23/100
10%
Value16.0 s
0/100
25%
Value11.4 s
5/100
10%
Value1,540 ms
13/100
30%
Value0.114
86/100
15%
Value17.0 s
4/100
10%
112 ms
598 ms
52 ms
24 ms
29 ms
Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Usfor.com, 10% (5 requests) were made to Cdn.shop.pe and 6% (3 requests) were made to Staticxx.facebook.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (724 ms) relates to the external source Staticxx.facebook.com.
Page size can be reduced by 878.4 kB (24%)
3.7 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Usfor.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 67.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Usfor images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 561.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 561.8 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 209.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Usfor.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 209.6 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (59%)
39
16
The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Usfor. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
usfor.com
112 ms
www.usfor.com
598 ms
style.css
52 ms
breadcrumbs.min.css
24 ms
theme.css
29 ms
usfor.css
26 ms
script.js
92 ms
css
59 ms
ga.js
9 ms
__utm.gif
11 ms
fbevents.js
219 ms
logo.png
54 ms
banner-bg.jpg
126 ms
USFOR_Website_Banner_Cornwall.jpg
338 ms
USFOR_Website_Banner_Flyers.jpg
198 ms
b_card_small.png
124 ms
triplelayered3.jpg
361 ms
Canvas_Print_Small.png
201 ms
Christmas_Card_Small43.png
200 ms
Christmas_Deco_Small22.png
360 ms
Dble_side_folded_Small.png
357 ms
widget_async.js
79 ms
32nyIRHyCu6iqEka_hbKsonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
150 ms
sKd0EMYPAh5PYCRKSryvW6CWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
151 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
288 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
290 ms
widget_v2.134.js
77 ms
widget.js
118 ms
widget.css
119 ms
163 ms
all.js
217 ms
params
62 ms
params
61 ms
counter_top.png
17 ms
addshoppers_tag.js
40 ms
addshoppers-icons.woff
4 ms
search.js
38 ms
search.js
12 ms
391 ms
xd_arbiter.php
509 ms
xd_arbiter.php
724 ms
pixel
372 ms
usersync
350 ms
1
371 ms
avatar_simple_visitor.png
83 ms
aL63HcygAAVYuCCsAAA==
1 ms
tap.php
7 ms
pixel
19 ms
32 ms
xd_arbiter.php
199 ms
usfor.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
usfor.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
usfor.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Usfor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Usfor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
usfor.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Usfor. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: