12.8 sec in total
4.9 sec
7.6 sec
214 ms
Visit ushangar.com now to see the best up-to-date Us Hangar content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ushangar.com
Get benefits with your airplane hangar construction plan & establish best in class aviation hangar buildings with Aircraft Hangar construction experts.
Visit ushangar.comWe analyzed Ushangar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 4.9 sec and then it took 7.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
ushangar.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.8 s
4/100
10%
Value10.7 s
0/100
25%
Value11.6 s
4/100
10%
Value140 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.401
25/100
15%
Value9.7 s
28/100
10%
4905 ms
367 ms
273 ms
254 ms
246 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Ushangar.com, 7% (3 requests) were made to Webnet-reputation.com and 7% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Ushangar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 377.1 kB (25%)
1.5 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Ushangar.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.8 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 26.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Us Hangar images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 241.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 241.4 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 90.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ushangar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 90.8 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (60%)
42
17
The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Us Hangar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ushangar.com
4905 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
367 ms
styles.css
273 ms
lightbox.min.css
254 ms
style.css
246 ms
bootstrap.min.css
368 ms
flexslider.css
326 ms
bootstrap-glyphicons.css
355 ms
theme.css
374 ms
frontend.css
399 ms
jquery.js
553 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
440 ms
gmedia.global.front.js
659 ms
js
27 ms
maps.js
541 ms
jquery.form.min.js
571 ms
scripts.js
546 ms
wp-lightbox-2.min.js
542 ms
bootstrap.min.js
706 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
1802 ms
superfish.js
1781 ms
custom.js
1799 ms
mobilemenu.js
1820 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.js
1778 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1798 ms
wp-embed.min.js
2101 ms
css
25 ms
analytics.js
41 ms
flashingyoutube.gif
1125 ms
hangar-logo-new.png
1201 ms
youtube_start.png
1496 ms
hps-004-1200x450.jpg
1562 ms
hps-005-1200x450.jpg
1669 ms
hps-003-1200x450.jpg
1622 ms
hps-008-1200x450.jpg
1600 ms
hps-007-1200x450.jpg
1606 ms
hs4-1200x450.jpg
1797 ms
hs1-1200x450.jpg
1812 ms
hps-006-1200x450.jpg
1829 ms
hs5-1200x450.jpg
1757 ms
yVHpdQrmTj9Kax1tmFSx2j8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
16 ms
RzoNiRR1p2Mqyyz2RwqSMw.woff
16 ms
AwBqWF2kjhlybWamaKMPcT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
17 ms
glyphiconshalflings-regular.woff
1771 ms
collect
14 ms
bg_direction_nav.png
189 ms
ushangar.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
ushangar.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ushangar.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ushangar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ushangar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ushangar.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Us Hangar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: