Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 98% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    86% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    54% of websites

webmail.uams.edu

Something went wrong

Page Load Speed

812 ms in total

First Response

143 ms

Resources Loaded

546 ms

Page Rendered

123 ms

webmail.uams.edu screenshot

About Website

Visit webmail.uams.edu now to see the best up-to-date Webmail Uams content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about webmail.uams.edu

Visit webmail.uams.edu

Key Findings

We analyzed Webmail.uams.edu page load time and found that the first response time was 143 ms and then it took 669 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

webmail.uams.edu performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

14/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.3 s

21/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.6 s

71/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

92/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.067

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.8 s

79/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

webmail.uams.edu

143 ms

base.css

46 ms

style-default.css

265 ms

style-skin-10.css

88 ms

jquery.js

277 ms

Our browser made a total of 14 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Webmail.uams.edu and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (277 ms) belongs to the original domain Webmail.uams.edu.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 239.5 kB (58%)

Content Size

412.1 kB

After Optimization

172.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Webmail.uams.edu main page is 412.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 215.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 7.0 kB

  • Original 9.9 kB
  • After minification 8.8 kB
  • After compression 2.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.1 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 7.0 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.6 kB

  • Original 86.5 kB
  • After minification 83.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Webmail Uams images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 144.7 kB

  • Original 215.5 kB
  • After minification 195.5 kB
  • After compression 70.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 144.7 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 85.2 kB

  • Original 100.2 kB
  • After minification 71.1 kB
  • After compression 15.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Webmail.uams.edu needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 85.2 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 6 (46%)

Requests Now

13

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 13 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Webmail Uams. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

webmail.uams.edu accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

webmail.uams.edu best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

webmail.uams.edu SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Webmail.uams.edu can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Webmail.uams.edu main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Webmail Uams. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: