5.7 sec in total
189 ms
3.8 sec
1.7 sec
Click here to check amazing Receiver Vergleich content for Germany. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about receiver.vergleich.org
llll➤ Aktueller und unabhängiger Receiver Test bzw. Vergleich 2024 inkl. ✓ Vergleichssieger, ✓ Preis-Leistungs-Sieger uvm. ➤ Jetzt vergleichen!
Visit receiver.vergleich.orgWe analyzed Receiver.vergleich.org page load time and found that the first response time was 189 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
receiver.vergleich.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
42/100
10%
Value3.8 s
54/100
25%
Value3.4 s
90/100
10%
Value830 ms
35/100
30%
Value0.04
99/100
15%
Value6.4 s
59/100
10%
189 ms
799 ms
240 ms
69 ms
192 ms
Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Receiver.vergleich.org, 16% (15 requests) were made to Vergleich.org and 10% (9 requests) were made to Api-img.billiger.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) relates to the external source Ssl-vg03.met.vgwort.de.
Page size can be reduced by 796.8 kB (63%)
1.3 MB
473.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Receiver.vergleich.org main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 594.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 115.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 115.7 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 10.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Receiver Vergleich images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 338.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 338.6 kB or 57% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 332.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Receiver.vergleich.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 332.2 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (43%)
82
47
The browser has sent 82 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Receiver Vergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
receiver.vergleich.org
189 ms
799 ms
2323230643.js
240 ms
css
69 ms
main.css
192 ms
head.min.js
312 ms
adsbygoogle.js
43 ms
jquery.min.js
80 ms
all.min.js
471 ms
tr.js
350 ms
analytics.js
148 ms
humax-icord-cable-hd-92.jpg
1065 ms
12152.gif
1944 ms
cc414a07b67744249c238da3815d16ab
2103 ms
xoro-hrt-8300-99.jpg
1751 ms
vu-zero-165.jpg
1060 ms
strong-srt-7004-155.jpg
1751 ms
xoro-hrs-8560-162.jpg
1833 ms
technisat-technistar-s2-105.jpg
1746 ms
xoro-hrk-7560-168.jpg
1823 ms
humax-icord-cable-hd-92-200x200.jpg
1819 ms
xoro-hrt-8300-99-200x200.jpg
1845 ms
11010.gif
1932 ms
4787.gif
1931 ms
9077.gif
1931 ms
5920.gif
1930 ms
14657.gif
1931 ms
3693.gif
2041 ms
4541.gif
2040 ms
10433.gif
2040 ms
amazon.gif
127 ms
sdk.js
1375 ms
logo-white.svg
151 ms
star-full.svg
149 ms
star-half.svg
153 ms
star-empty.svg
971 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
1002 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
1023 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
1259 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
1314 ms
icon-font.woff
919 ms
collect
865 ms
collect
1587 ms
ca-pub-4407413360917429.js
853 ms
zrt_lookup.html
1280 ms
show_ads_impl.js
1279 ms
Wu_UMrpzUvo
1557 ms
logo-small.svg
1100 ms
icon-top.svg
994 ms
footer_pfeil_newsletter.png
1066 ms
widgets.js
1535 ms
platform.js
1479 ms
nav.json
671 ms
ga-audiences
490 ms
ads
471 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
197 ms
www-embed-player.js
233 ms
osd.js
86 ms
232 ms
ads
410 ms
xd_arbiter.php
400 ms
ads
370 ms
ads
340 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
77 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
95 ms
fastbutton
179 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
98 ms
postmessageRelay
129 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
51 ms
ad_status.js
123 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
27 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
63 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
60 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
56 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.de.html
66 ms
blank.gif
146 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
32 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
50 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
11 ms
ads.js
188 ms
14706322608479754516
51 ms
abg.js
55 ms
m_js_controller.js
67 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
50 ms
x_button_blue2.png
62 ms
jot
188 ms
s
92 ms
favicon
123 ms
favicon
151 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
78 ms
New%20folder_56_VS-CODE_728x90_A.jpg
83 ms
ddcssl.htm
81 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
25 ms
pixel
42 ms
receiver.vergleich.org accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
receiver.vergleich.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
receiver.vergleich.org SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Receiver.vergleich.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Receiver.vergleich.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
receiver.vergleich.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Receiver Vergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: