Report Summary

  • 43

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 56

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    28% of websites

  • 57

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

valleytalk.org

弯曲评论

Page Load Speed

10.7 sec in total

First Response

1.1 sec

Resources Loaded

5.8 sec

Page Rendered

3.8 sec

valleytalk.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to valleytalk.org homepage info - get ready to check Valleytalk best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about valleytalk.org

云来了,安全盒子怎么办 by

Visit valleytalk.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Valleytalk.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 9.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

valleytalk.org performance score

43

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

23/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

45/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.8 s

49/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,030 ms

26/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.4 s

15/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.valleytalk.org

1107 ms

fYpRCoAgEAUv1CYeaUkRYVPxLYi3b4uKvvp5DG_Gu6DUKnSwiGMgKtwGfG-CTomL_0lTz8GC0SwQgbuWTD4ntLPmkk718h1wCKSVuMwTtRqsey4H.css

225 ms

style.php

226 ms

M9bPKixNLaoEAA.js

419 ms

NctBCoAwDETREw3BI9Uy0CxsQ5Ma9PTqwuWH9zdJvbWYoU6WIK6xJkZ29BJ6EmptdOIVEo0HXZL7V16nWvj_Pw.js

230 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 58% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Valleytalk.org, 6% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 6% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) relates to the external source Static.xgres.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 629.6 kB (37%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Valleytalk.org main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 993.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 231.7 kB

  • Original 282.1 kB
  • After minification 269.4 kB
  • After compression 50.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 231.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 139.1 kB

  • Original 993.0 kB
  • After minification 853.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Valleytalk needs image optimization as it can save up to 139.1 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-62%

Potential reduce by 240.0 kB

  • Original 390.0 kB
  • After minification 390.0 kB
  • After compression 150.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 240.0 kB or 62% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 18.9 kB

  • Original 23.0 kB
  • After minification 18.9 kB
  • After compression 4.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Valleytalk.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 18.9 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 25 (42%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

34

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Valleytalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

valleytalk.org accessibility score

56

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

valleytalk.org best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

valleytalk.org SEO score

57

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ZH

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Valleytalk.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Chinese is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Valleytalk.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Valleytalk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: