Tools & Wizards About Us
vergelijking.nl screenshot

Report Summary

  • 64

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    78% of other websites

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

vergelijking.nl

Vergelijken loont altijd op vergelijking.nl

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

365 ms

Resources Loaded

975 ms

Page Rendered

113 ms

vergelijking.nl screenshot

About Website

Welcome to vergelijking.nl homepage info - get ready to check Vergelijking best content right away, or after learning these important things about vergelijking.nl

Betaal niet teveel voor je energie, je verzekeringen, je uitvaart of je vakantie, vergelijk nu.

Visit vergelijking.nl

Key Findings

We analyzed Vergelijking.nl page load time and found that the first response time was 365 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

vergelijking.nl performance score

64

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

22/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.109

87/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.9 s

54/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.vergelijking.nl

365 ms

vergelijking.css

156 ms

vergelijking.js

154 ms

geldlenen2.gif

258 ms

ga.js

8 ms

Our browser made a total of 9 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 67% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Vergelijking.nl, 22% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 11% (1 request) were made to Banners.bwm.nl. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (365 ms) belongs to the original domain Vergelijking.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 30.0 kB (47%)

Content Size

63.6 kB

After Optimization

33.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Vergelijking.nl main page is 63.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 28.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 17.3 kB

  • Original 21.4 kB
  • After minification 21.0 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 8.2 kB
  • After minification 8.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Vergelijking images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 8.1 kB

  • Original 28.3 kB
  • After minification 26.3 kB
  • After compression 20.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.1 kB or 29% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 4.6 kB

  • Original 5.6 kB
  • After minification 4.6 kB
  • After compression 1.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Vergelijking.nl needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 4.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

8

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Vergelijking. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

www.vergelijking.nl

www.vergelijking.nl

365 ms

vergelijking.css

vergelijking.css

156 ms

vergelijking.js

vergelijking.js

154 ms

geldlenen2.gif

geldlenen2.gif

258 ms

ga.js

ga.js

8 ms

logo-vergelijking.gif

logo-vergelijking.gif

84 ms

cat-main-001.jpg

cat-main-001.jpg

164 ms

vz_120x600_3.gif

vz_120x600_3.gif

246 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

14 ms

Accessibility Review

vergelijking.nl accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

vergelijking.nl best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

vergelijking.nl SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NL

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Vergelijking.nl can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Vergelijking.nl main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

vergelijking.nl

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Vergelijking. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: