Report Summary

  • 22

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    40% of other websites

  • 54

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 23% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

videomagasinet.no

VIDEOMAGASINET - For deg som elsker videofilm i alle formater

Page Load Speed

5.2 sec in total

First Response

344 ms

Resources Loaded

4.1 sec

Page Rendered

781 ms

videomagasinet.no screenshot

About Website

Visit videomagasinet.no now to see the best up-to-date VIDEOMAGASINET content for Norway and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about videomagasinet.no

VIDEOMAGASINET. FAGBLADET OM FILM. KINO VIDEO VOD | Videomagasinet

Visit videomagasinet.no

Key Findings

We analyzed Videomagasinet.no page load time and found that the first response time was 344 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

videomagasinet.no performance score

22

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value13.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value15.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,100 ms

23/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.044

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.9 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

videomagasinet.no

344 ms

www.videomagasinet.no

416 ms

system.base.css

225 ms

system.menus.css

226 ms

system.messages.css

227 ms

Our browser made a total of 169 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 75% of them (127 requests) were addressed to the original Videomagasinet.no, 7% (12 requests) were made to Superfish.dk and 4% (7 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Videomagasinet.no.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.0 MB (37%)

Content Size

7.9 MB

After Optimization

5.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Videomagasinet.no main page is 7.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 7.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 133.2 kB

  • Original 157.8 kB
  • After minification 156.4 kB
  • After compression 24.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 133.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 2.5 MB

  • Original 7.4 MB
  • After minification 4.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, VIDEOMAGASINET needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.5 MB or 34% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 230.4 kB

  • Original 313.8 kB
  • After minification 264.0 kB
  • After compression 83.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 230.4 kB or 73% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 80.1 kB

  • Original 104.6 kB
  • After minification 88.5 kB
  • After compression 24.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Videomagasinet.no needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 80.1 kB or 77% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 63 (38%)

Requests Now

166

After Optimization

103

The browser has sent 166 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of VIDEOMAGASINET. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

videomagasinet.no accessibility score

54

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

videomagasinet.no best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

videomagasinet.no SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    NO

  • Language Claimed

    NB

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Videomagasinet.no can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Norwegian is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed language. Our system also found out that Videomagasinet.no main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of VIDEOMAGASINET. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: